Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Thursday, April 25, 2024 73° Today's Paper


Top News

Tesla crash could hurt sentiment on driverless cars

1/1
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

In this image from video, Frank Baressi speaks during an interview with The Associated Press at his home in Palm Harbor, Fla. Thursday. Baressi, 62, was the driver of the truck that was hit by a Tesla that Joshua D. Brown, of Canton, Ohio, was operating in self-driving mode, and who was killed in the May 7 accident in Williston, Fla.

DETROIT » It was the crash the auto industry knew was coming but still feared.

The death of a driver who was using Tesla Motors’ semi-autonomous mode could add to the public’s apprehension of driverless cars even before they reach the road in big numbers. Most major automakers and technology companies, including Google and Uber, are working on fully autonomous cars, and have worried that a highly publicized crash could hurt those efforts.

Joshua D. Brown, 40, of Canton, Ohio, died in the accident May 7 in Williston, Florida. According to a Tesla statement issued Thursday, the cameras on Brown’s Tesla Model S failed to distinguish the white side of a turning tractor-trailer from a brightly lit sky and didn’t automatically activate its brakes. Brown didn’t take control and activate the brakes either, Tesla said.

Brown was an enthusiastic booster of his 2015 Tesla Model S and in an April video he posted online he credited its sophisticated Autopilot system for avoiding a crash when a commercial truck swerved into his lane on an interstate.

Automakers and analysts have said they need to be careful as they introduce more and more semi-autonomous features, from automatic braking to adaptive cruise control. People can quickly learn to rely on them, or assume they work better than they actually do. The possibility of a fatal accident was always a concern.

“For years people have been saying the technology is ready, and it’s one of my pet peeves, because no it’s not,” said Bryant Walker Smith, a law professor at the University of South Carolina and an expert on autonomous driving issues.

Tesla stressed that its Autopilot system is new, noting that drivers must manually enable it and that they “must maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle” while using the system.

“Autopilot is getting better all the time, but it is not perfect and still requires the driver to remain alert,” the Palo Alto, California-based company said in a statement.

Karl Brauer, a senior analyst with Kelley Blue Book, said the accident is a huge hit to Tesla’s reputation.

“They have been touting their safety and they have been touting their advanced technology,” he said. “This situation flies in the face of both.”

Tesla’s shares dropped 3 percent in after-hours trading to $206.25 after the government said it would investigate how Tesla’s Autopilot system performed at the time of the crash.

But beyond Tesla, the accident could increase public skepticism about semi-autonomous and autonomous driving. In a survey released last month by the University of Michigan, two-thirds of drivers said they are moderately or very concerned about riding in a self-driving vehicle. Just 16 percent of the 618 drivers surveyed said they would rather ride in a self-driving car.

Walker Smith said it was inevitable that a semi-autonomous or autonomous car would crash. The Brown crash can help focus the discussion of regulators and others on driverless technology and its limitations, he said. It could also remind drivers that the technology isn’t perfect and they need to stay alert.

But Walker Smith said it would be unfortunate if public sentiment swung so far against driverless cars that people would never benefit from their lifesaving potential. On the day the Tesla driver died, he said, approximately 100 other people died on U.S. roads. No one knows how many of those deaths could have been prevented by cars that could predict crashes before they happen and brake by themselves.

“Driving today is dangerous, and there is no panacea. Every solution creates its own set of problems,” Smith said.

6 responses to “Tesla crash could hurt sentiment on driverless cars”

  1. cholo says:

    blame the driver not the car. tesla clearly states that you must remain alert even when in autopilot. this poor fool didn’t heed their warning.

  2. allie says:

    Tesla seems like a bore. More a gimmick than anything else.

    • dragoninwater says:

      A revolutionary American car company that has General Motors shaking in it’s boots and countless other auto manufacturers trying to catch up to and you think Tesla is a bore? You must have been blinded by Mufi’s rail propaganda as a solution to traffic while the rest of America will have it’s traffic issues resolved with self driving cars in about the time our choo-choo will be completed.

  3. dragoninwater says:

    “Brown didn’t take control and activate the brakes either, Tesla said.”

    That statement sums up everything in a nutshell. If the car would NOT have been engaged in self driving mode, the driver himself would have likely gotten into the accident given the circumstances.

  4. Boots says:

    One should always be alert when driving. Exception may be driving across Nevada or someplace with little or no traffic on the road.

    • cojef says:

      There’s no exceptions! Drivers are responsible for their actions when in charge of the vehicle! Love to drive and still drive after learning to drive back in the late 30’s on Kauai in the backyard where it was full of “bull-grass” that slowed the car down, speed wise. The tall grass provided resistance enough to kill the engine if you let your foot of the accelerator.

Leave a Reply