comscore Utah father charged $40 for ‘skin-to-skin’ contact with newborn | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Utah father charged $40 for ‘skin-to-skin’ contact with newborn

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Lidia Grassley and her son Samuel at Utah Valley Hospital in Provo, Utah. Ryan Grassley discovered a perplexing charge on a hospital bill for the recent birth of his son. Nearly $40 for “skin to skin” contact after his wife gave birth via cesarean section.

SALT LAKE CITY » Ryan Grassley discovered a perplexing charge on a hospital bill for the recent birth of his son: Nearly $40 for “skin to skin” contact after his wife gave birth via cesarean section.

Amused by the bill, he posted a picture of it on Reddit this week and commented: “I had to pay $39.35 to hold my baby after he was born.”

The post set off a flurry of outrage and consternation on Reddit. Nearly 12,000 people commented, with many sharing their own stories of what they said were bizarre or ridiculous medical charges.

“A lot of people like to be shocked and outraged by things,” Grassley said in an interview Wednesday. “Today, It happened to be my hospital bill.”

The fee technically wasn’t for Grassley to hold his baby, but to have an additional nurse present in the hospital recovery room for C-section patients to ensure the mother and baby were safe, said Janet Frank, spokeswoman for Utah Valley Hospital in Provo, Utah.

“There is never a charge for a patient to hold their baby,” Frank said.

Grassley said that he wasn’t mad about the bill or seeking reimbursement but thought posting it would make people laugh. He’s also hopeful the attention the bill attracted might lead hospitals to be more precise about their billing charges.

He said he and his wife were pleased with the doctors and nurses who handled the Sept. 4 birth of their second child, a boy named Samuel.

A GoFundMe account Grasley set up to pay the bill brought in $60 by Wednesday afternoon and he has a plan for the surplus.

“Any money donated over the $39.35 will be put toward a vasectomy because I never want to go through these sleepless new baby nights again,” Grassley wrote on GoFundMe.

He sent Frank an email on Tuesday apologizing for ruining her day as media attention about the bill intensified.

“Maybe it should have said, ‘Sorry for your ruining your week,’” Grassley said.

Comments (4)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • Those of us who pay the medical bills are not amused. When the nurse or doctor says–do you wish to have this or that–they should show the price tag–nothing is free in the hospitals. The Senate and Congress just had hearings with the Mylan company on the price of their prescription mark up was horrible–try the 1,000% + markups on aspirin and bandaids.

    • I thought the same the thing about the title. How about the simple fix of adding “was”: “Utah father was charged $40 for ‘skin-to-skin’ contact with newborn”.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up