Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Friday, December 13, 2024 78° Today's Paper


Top News

Global deal reached to limit powerful greenhouse gases

1/3
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

U.S Secretary of State John Kerry disembarks from his aircraft upon his arrival at the airport in Kigali, Rwanda on Thursday where he is due to attend the 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.

2/3
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Secretary of State John Kerry delivers a speech to the 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, in Kigali, Rwanda on Friday.

3/3
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Secretary of State John Kerry, center-left at podium, delivers a speech to the 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, in Kigali, Rwanda on Friday.

KIGALI, Rwanda » Nearly 200 nations have reached a deal to limit the use of greenhouse gases far more powerful than carbon dioxide in a major effort to fight climate change.

The talks on hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs, were called the first test of global will since the historic Paris Agreement to cut carbon emissions was reached last year. HFCs are described as the world’s fastest-growing climate pollutant and are used in air conditioners and refrigerators.

The agreement announced Saturday morning, after all-night negotiations, caps and reduces the use of HFCs in a gradual process beginning by 2019 with action by developed countries including the United States, the world’s second-worst polluter. More than 100 developing countries, including China, the world’s top carbon emitter, will start taking action by 2024, when HFC consumption levels should peak.

A small group of countries including India, Pakistan and some Gulf states pushed for and secured a later start in 2028, saying their economies need more time to grow. That’s three years earlier than India, the world’s third-worst polluter, had first proposed.

Environmental groups had hoped that the deal could reduce global warming by a half-degree Celsius by the end of this century. This agreement gets about 90 percent of the way there, said Durwood Zaelke, president of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development.

Zaelke’s group said this is the “largest temperature reduction ever achieved by a single agreement.”

The new agreement is “equal to stopping the entire world’s fossil-fuel CO2 emissions for more than two years,” David Doniger, climate and clean air program director with the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement.

Experts said they hope that market forces will help speed up the limits agreed to in the deal.

“Compromises had to be made, but 85 percent of developing countries have committed to the early schedule starting 2024, which is a very significant achievement,” Clare Perry, UK Climate Campaign Leader with the Environmental Investigation Agency, said in a statement.

HFCs were introduced in the 1980s as a substitute for ozone-depleting gases. But their danger has grown as air conditioner and refrigerator sales have soared in emerging economies like China and India. HFCs are also found in inhalers and insulating foams.

Major economies have debated how fast to phase out HFCs. The United States, whose delegation was led by Secretary of State John Kerry, and Western countries want quick action. Nations such as India want to give their industries more time to adjust.

Small island states and many African countries had pushed for quick action, saying they face the biggest threat from climate change.

“It may not be entirely what the islands wanted, but it is a good deal,” the minister-in-assistance to the president of the Marshall Islands, Mattlan Zackhras, said in a statement. “We all know we must go further, and we will go further.”

The U.N. says the next meeting in 2017 will determine just how much of the billions of dollars needed to finance the reduction of HFCs will be provided by countries.

HFCs are less plentiful than carbon dioxide, but Kerry said last month that they currently emit as much pollution as 300 coal-fired power plants each year. That amount will rise significantly over the coming decades as air conditioning units and refrigerators reach hundreds of millions of new people.

HFCs don’t harm the ozone layer like chlorofluorocarbons and similar gases that were eliminated under the 1987 Montreal Protocol. The entire world ratified that agreement, helping to repair holes in the ozone that helps shield the planet from the harmful rays of the sun. The aim of this meeting was to attach an amendment to that treaty dealing specifically with HFCs.

“This is about much more than the ozone layer and HFCs. It is a clear statement by all world leaders that the green transformation started in Paris is irreversible and unstoppable,” Erik Solheim, executive director of the U.N. Environment Program, said in a statement.

8 responses to “Global deal reached to limit powerful greenhouse gases”

  1. star08 says:

    Good for us all. Too little, too late, but it will help.

  2. justmyview371 says:

    I’m sure all the delegates in the Rwanda meeting decided to do without A/C. No Way.

    • CEI says:

      Hey! These people are doing serious business for you and I How dare you suggest they do without AC or fly on commercial jets or stay in budget hotels or dine on locally produced food and drink? The truth of the matter is that it’s not about lowering the plant’s temperature 1/2 deg. C by the end of the century. Think about that statement for a minute and try to imagine how idiotic it is. It’s about power consolidation in fewer and fewer hands plain and simple.

      • cajaybird says:

        It will be interesting to see which country pays for the brunt of all action. I’ll give you three guesses. Any commitment by the U.S. should be agreed upon by our Congress. I hate to be a skeptic, but who polices what other countries do with the money they receive. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of it ends up in the Clinton Foundation (unfortunately I’m not joking). This action is as much about income redistribution as it as lowering the temperature of the planet. I wonder if we’ll be told who negotiates for the U.S.

        • Tempmanoa says:

          The US will benefit from this because American companies have developed a replacementt for HFC’s– these companies have been backers of the agreement. We lead the world in development of replacements for HFC and in design of new AC units to prevent release of HFC and take the new replacements.

        • cajaybird says:

          IRT Temmanoa: Excellent point. I do not know what the overall impact would be to the economy. In fact, that’s the reason no agreements should be made without the approval of Congress. For example, any carbon tax involving middlemen like Al Gore I’m opposed to. Thanks for the civil response. I believe that is how debates should work (without name calling), so a civil response is a pleasant surprise.

  3. WizardOfMoa says:

    Oops! This is a serious subject, but sometimes this old timer’s sense of humor erupts at the wrong time…thank heaven there would be a limit of gases…can you imagine the discomfort what all of us must endure via our sense of smell? Lol

Leave a Reply