Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Saturday, December 14, 2024 79° Today's Paper


Top News

Judge orders Michigan recount to begin at noon Monday

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Green party presidential candidate Jill Stein meets her supporters during a campaign stop at Humanist Hall in Oakland, Calif.

DETROIT >> Michigan must begin its presidential recount at noon Monday, a federal judge ruled in a late-night order that could make it more likely the state will complete the count ahead of a Dec. 13 deadline.

In his ruling Sunday night, Judge Mark Goldsmith rejected an effort by state officials to delay the hand-counting of about 4.8 million ballots.

Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein argued that a law is unconstitutional that requires a break of at least two business days after the Board of Canvassers’ final action on a recount request. Goldsmith found that Stein had “shown the likelihood of irreparable harm” if the count was delayed even by two days and rejected the state’s arguments about the cost to taxpayers.

Republican Donald Trump defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton by 10,704 votes, or two-tenths of a percentage point, in Michigan. Stein received about 1 percent of the vote.

Republican Attorney General Bill Schuette, the Trump campaign and super PACs have filed separate lawsuits asking state courts to prevent the recount, arguing that Stein, as the fourth-place finisher, is not “aggrieved” because she has no chance of winning in a recount.

The Green Party also wants recounts in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Stein has argued, without evidence, that irregularities in the votes in all three states suggest that there could have been tampering with the vote, perhaps through a well-coordinated, highly complex cyberattack.

Elections officials in the three states, all narrowly won by Trump, have expressed confidence in their results. Even if all three recounts happen, none were expected to give Clinton enough votes to emerge as the winner.

19 responses to “Judge orders Michigan recount to begin at noon Monday”

  1. Keonigohan says:

    The last sentence in the article summarizes the futile attempts by the Crooked hiLIARy & Stein cartels.

    January 20, 2012 #MAGA

    • NanakuliBoss says:

      You don’t sleep. You troll all night. Maybe get alerts from your favorite SA?

    • Tita Girl says:

      Stein is doing MI a favor by spending all of that ca$h on a recount.

    • lespark says:

      Demmies are sore losers.

    • bsdetection says:

      No one, not Jill Stein, not Hillary Clinton, not anyone pushing for recounts has ever suggested that their aim is overturn the results. The recounts are about election integrity. No one has spread more false information about fraudulent elections than Donald Trump, and it is the height of hypocrisy for him to claim that elections are rigged and to tweet lies about millions of illegal voters and then to criticize recounts that are intended to investigate election integrity.

  2. okmaluna says:

    The countdown timer is ticking. Their options are dwindling. The last gasp is hysterics. Then silence… we hope.

  3. CEI says:

    A jail cell for Waldo Clinton and a rubber room for nutty Dr. Stein. The Green Party may be green on the outside but it’s commie/progressive red on the inside.

  4. Pocho says:

    BEWARE of the 2020 Democratic ticket; Liberals of steroids:
    PochaHauntess/FrankinSTEIN! Yikes!

  5. bsdetection says:

    In a court filing in Michigan, Trump’s lawyers effectively called him a liar when they said, “All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake.”

  6. AhiPoke says:

    Two thoughts. 1 – This would be a lot more credible if she had stated her lack of confidence in the US election system before the election. 2 – If she’s correct, our country is in really bad shape if we can’t trust the results of elections, which is fundamental to our everything we are as a country.

  7. okmaluna says:

    Russian hackers? Bwaah! So why not audit all 50 states? Probably blame ufo’s next.

  8. CEI says:

    Voter ID would solve the problem. I have no idea why democrats oppose it so vociferously.

    • Cricket_Amos says:

      i agree about the ID.

      It seems quite remarkable that someone who got about 1% of the vote can ask for a recount with no direct evidence of any problem.
      Does this mean that anyone can ask for a recount?

Leave a Reply