comscore In bitter divide, repeal of North Carolina LGBT law fails | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

In bitter divide, repeal of North Carolina LGBT law fails

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    State Sen. Jay Chaudhuri, D-Wake, spoke on the senate floor during a special session of the North Carolina General Assembly called to consider repeal of NC HB2 today.

RALEIGH, N.C. >> Amid deepening acrimony, a supposedly bipartisan deal to kill the North Carolina law known as the “bathroom bill” fell apart tonight, ensuring the likelihood that global corporations and national sports events will continue to stay away from the state.

The law limits protections for LGBT people and was best known for a provision that requires transgender people to use public restrooms corresponding to the gender on their birth certificates. It was passed earlier this year after Charlotte officials approved a sweeping anti-discrimination ordinance.

The repeal compromise touted by both Democratic Gov.-elect Roy Cooper and GOP Gov. Pat McCrory called for Charlotte to do away with its ordinance. In exchange, lawmakers would undo the LGBT law.

But both sides balked: GOP lawmakers cried foul when Charlotte leaders initially left part of the city’s ordinance in place. And when a Senate bill called for a six-month ban on cities passing similar ordinances, Democrats said Republicans were going back on their promise. The moratorium was modified to last until a month after legislators finished their annual session in 2017, which would likely mean August or later.

“This wasn’t the deal,” said Sen. Jeff Jackson, a Charlotte Democrat. “This bill breaks this deal. Charlotte would have not repealed its ordinance if this was the deal.”

The troubles in reaching a resolution exposed the intense distrust within the legislature that has only intensified over the years, especially since Republicans took over control of state government in 2013. Cooper’s victory was greeted last week by Republicans acting in a special session to strip away several powers.

“This has been a long and ultimately frustrating day,” Senate leader Phil Berger told reporters after the session ended.

He blamed Cooper for sinking the deal. Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Dan Blue criticized McCrory for calling the special session a few days before Christmas when there didn’t seem to be an agreement.

Social conservatives were thrilled with the preservation of HB2. North Carolina Values Coalition executive director Tami Fitzgerald praised lawmakers “who stood up for what is right and represented the will of voters by stopping the move to cower and cave-in to the City of Charlotte and the Human Rights Campaign.”

Social conservative groups said HB2 provides privacy and protection for children using restrooms and locker rooms.

Lawmakers have worked “hard to protect our families, and women and children from the risk that might be imposed by these lunatic ordinances that the lunatic left in Charlotte and other places want to enact,” said Republican Sen. Buck Newton, who championed HB2 when it was passed in March and supported it ever since.

The U.S. Justice Department and others contend the threat of sexual predators posing as transgender persons to enter a bathroom is practically nonexistent.

“This was a counterproductive exercise in reaffirming to the rest of the country that North Carolina wants to remain mired in this divisive dispute,” said Simone Bell, Southern regional director at Lambda Legal, a gay-rights group.

HB2 has been blasted by gay-rights groups and resulted in conventions, jobs and sporting events like the NBA All-Star Game shunning North Carolina. Corporate critics of the law included Deutsche Bank and Paypal, which both backed out of projects that would have brought hundreds of jobs to the state.

The law was also seen as a referendum on McCrory, who became its national face. He lost by about 10,000 votes to Cooper. Meanwhile, fellow Republicans U.S. Sen. Richard Burr and President-elect Donald Trump comfortably won the state.

McCrory was the first sitting North Carolina governor elected to a four-year term to lose re-election.

Repealing the state law could also have ended protracted legal challenges by the federal Justice Department and transgender residents. Much of that litigation has been delayed while the U.S. Supreme Court hears a separate Virginia case on transgender restroom access.

Cooper said earlier this week that Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore had assured him that Charlotte’s vote to repeal its ordinance would lead to a full repeal. He had lobbied Charlotte’s city council to gut its local nondiscrimination ordinance.

“The legislature had a chance to do the right thing for North Carolina, and they failed,” he said Wednesday night. “This was our best chance. It cannot be our last chance.”

Comments (11)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

      • I understand your comment to mean the NC law discriminates against how someone thinks or feels about themselves that is completely opposite reality. It is nonsensical for thoughts and perceptions trump reality. Only liberals would dream up something like this.

      • Pirate, using your reasoning, it would be discrimination if an 18-year-old who identifies with 21-year-olds was not allowed to buy alcohol. What do you think about that?

        • Not the same reasoning. Nothing to do with identifying with a 21 year old. Think Gender…
          So you wouldn’t mind if a transgender (dressed as) came into the mens/womens restroom while you are in there? I don’t care. Sometimes it’s really difficult to know what gender some really are.

        • Dai, I and many others do care, and I am thinking gender. It used to be called sex of which there are only two, male and female. Facebook and other social media now have about sixty (60) genders subscribers can use to “self-identify.” It is utter madness to forcibly change morals and behavior of the entire population of the United States to accommodate how someone feels about themselves. And the reasoning I used in the above example is the same. If we must allow a guy who self-identifies as a woman use a women’s restroom, we should also allow a teen agers who identifies as a 21-year-old buy alcohol or cigarettes. We should also allow people who self-identify as jackasses, Democrats of course, sleep in the barn, and to be fair about it, we also should allow those who self-identify as elephants, Republicans, to sleep in a zoo. Why should the law apply to LGBT people only?

  • This is probably the most difficult story to understand this week. I haven’t tracked the story – don’t care much for the topic – and don’t really understand. Thankfully I know which restroom I have to use, here or in NC (I think…).

Scroll Up