LONDON >> The Daily Mail apologized to Melania Trump on Wednesday and agreed to pay damages to settle two lawsuits she had filed over an article last year asserting that the professional modeling agency she worked for in the 1990s had also been an escort service.
“We accept that these allegations about Mrs. Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them,” a lawyer for the British newspaper told a judge, Andrew Nicol, at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. “We apologize to Mrs. Trump for any distress that our publication caused her. To settle Mrs. Trump’s two lawsuits against us, we have agreed to pay her damages and costs.”
The terms of the settlement were not immediately disclosed. She had sought compensatory and punitive damages of at least $150 million, according to the filing.
The Daily Mail published its article on Trump on Aug. 20, 2016, quoting from a report in a magazine in Slovenia, where she was born, and a biography of her by a journalist, Bojan Pozar.
In September, Trump sued The Daily Mail in Montgomery County in Maryland, as well as in London, and the tabloid quickly published a retraction.
After the Maryland court dismissed that case, saying it did not have jurisdiction, Trump filed a new case in February, in New York.
Her new lawsuit did not explicitly mention the White House or President Donald Trump or even her status as the wife of a presidential candidate at the time the article was published.
Instead, it said that the article had harmed her opportunities “to launch a broad-based commercial brand in multiple product categories,” noting that “the plaintiff is one of the most photographed women in the world,” and asserting that “the plaintiff’s brand has lost significant value.”
Melania Trump also sued a Maryland blogger, Webster Tarpley, who published claims like those cited by The Daily Mail and who agreed to pay a settlement.
The Daily Mail and Charles J. Harder, a lawyer for Trump, issued a joint statement confirming the settlement that noted that the retraction and apology would be published in The Daily Mail and in its American and British online versions, and it added that the newspaper would pay damages and the costs of the litigation.