comscore Justice Dept. wants more ways to deny sanctuary cities money | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Justice Dept. wants more ways to deny sanctuary cities money

  • ASSOCIATED RPESS

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a department memorandum on Monday, May 22, that the department may “tailor grants to promote a lawful system of immigration.” That suggests officials could seek ways to withhold money from communities that refuse to honor detainer requests from federal immigration authorities.

WASHINGTON >> The Justice Department is looking to use its control over coveted grant money to nudge so-called sanctuary cities into greater cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities, despite a judge’s ruling that blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to cut off millions to such communities.

A judge in April struck down Trump’s executive order on the matter, saying the president has no authority to attach new conditions of his own to grants that were approved by Congress.

But in a memo issued Monday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the Justice Department still can put more stringent conditions on the money it doles out and “may seek to tailor grants to promote a lawful system of immigration.”

The memo reasserts the department’s position that Trump’s executive order applies to a relatively small amount of money, specifically grants that require localities to comply with a specific immigration law related to information-sharing among police and federal immigration authorities. In striking down the order, the judge said Trump’s own rhetoric showed the administration intended it to apply broadly to all sorts of federal funding.

The judge issued the ruling in response to two lawsuits, one brought by the city of San Francisco, the other by Santa Clara County.

Justice Department officials have suggested they could still look for ways to keep federal grant money from cities that decline voluntary requests from immigration officials to keep defendants in custody while they await deportation — or to reward cities that do cooperate.

The department has already threatened to pull money from jurisdictions that prevent local police and sheriffs from freely sharing information with federal immigration authorities about the citizenship status of people in their custody. It sent warning letters to nine localities in April, though most of the cities that received them denied being out of compliance.

Some cities remained defiant after the Monday memo.

The memo “doesn’t change the constitutional problems of the executive order. That order tried to take away all federal funding from sanctuary cities, and we can’t trust this administration not to make good on its threats,” San Francisco’s City Attorney Dennis Herrera said. “The federal government can’t hold a gun to the head of cities and counties and force them to spend their limited police resources on immigration enforcement.”

Comments (0)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up