Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Thursday, December 12, 2024 79° Today's Paper


Top News

Among the job cuts at The New York Times, the public editor

ASSOCIATED PRESS

People walk by The New York Times headquarters, in New York on May 2. Today, The New York Times announced it is ditching its “public editor” position that was started in 2003 after the Jayson Blair plagiarism scandal to improve its credibility with readers.

NEW YORK >> The New York Times is ditching its public editor position, created in 2003 as the paper sought to restore its credibility with readers after a plagiarism scandal.

Publisher Arthur Sulzberger wrote in a memo today that the public editor’s role “has outgrown that one office” and that the paper is instead creating a “reader center” to interact with the public and will allow more commenting on stories. The paper’s current public editor, Liz Spayd, will leave Friday.

Margaret Sullivan, the well-regarded former Times public editor, now a media columnist at the Washington Post, tweeted that she was not surprised that the Times dropped the role, which she characterized as a “a burr under the saddle for the powers that be” and capable of holding managers’ “feet to the fire.” She noted that other newspapers, including her current employer, have dropped public editors in recent years.

Spayd had taken up her duties as the paper’s sixth public editor last summer. Some of her criticisms were panned as tin-eared or inappropriate by media observers and Times insiders, including New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet.

Spayd did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Times also announced its latest round of newsroom buyouts today, aimed primarily at editors. It said layoffs were possible if enough staffers did not accept buyouts. But the company is still hiring — it wants to shrink its editing corps and add more reporters.

Newsrooms across the U.S. have long been cutting back on staff as print-ad revenue shrinks. Digital ad growth has not been enough to make up the shortfall.

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines. Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.