comscore Duke, Dominion cancel contested Atlantic Coast Pipeline | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Duke, Dominion cancel contested Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS
                                Signs mark the route of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in Deerfield, Va., in 2018. Dominion Energy Virginia recently told state regulators “significant build-out” of natural gas-fired generating facilities is no longer viable because of renewable energy legislation lawmakers passed earlier this year.

    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Signs mark the route of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in Deerfield, Va., in 2018. Dominion Energy Virginia recently told state regulators “significant build-out” of natural gas-fired generating facilities is no longer viable because of renewable energy legislation lawmakers passed earlier this year.

RICHMOND, Va. >> The developers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline announced today that they are canceling the multi-state natural gas project, citing delays and “increasing cost uncertainty.”

Despite a victory last month at the United States Supreme Court over a critical permit, Dominion Energy and Duke Energy said in a statement that “recent developments have created an unacceptable layer of uncertainty and anticipated delays” for the $8 billion project designed to cross West Virginia and Virginia into North Carolina.

“This announcement reflects the increasing legal uncertainty that overhangs large-scale energy and industrial infrastructure development in the United States. Until these issues are resolved, the ability to satisfy the country’s energy needs will be significantly challenged,” Dominion CEO Tom Farrell and Duke CEO Lynn Good said in a joint statement.

The project has drawn fierce opposition from a coalition of landowners, activists and environmental advocates, who said it would damage pristine landscapes and questioned whether there was sufficient need for the gas it would carry.

It has also faced numerous setbacks since plans were first announced in 2014. Legal challenges brought by environmental groups have prompted the dismissal or suspension of numerous permits and led to an extended delay in construction.

Comments (2)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up