Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
Efficiency often implies faster decision-making and payroll cuts. However, government efficiency differs from corporate practices in a number of ways.
CEOs can quickly make decisions based on targeted advice and financial impact. In contrast, political leaders must consider input from experts, interest groups and the public — a time-intensive process that values diverse perspectives and fosters consensus. While the slower decision-making processes may seem inefficient, they build public trust and legitimacy.
Cost-cutting poses another challenge. Reducing government payroll may appear fiscally responsible, but public jobs do more than provide services — they create jobs that support economies. Moreover, governments have an ethical responsibility to model democratic values by providing compensation that reflects employees’ skills, respects the dignity of work and meets needs.
Ultimately, government efficiency must balance fiscal responsibility with its ethical obligation to serve the public good and strengthen democracy. CEOs have few ethical constraints.
Carl Sabatino
Kapahulu
EXPRESS YOURSELF
The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions. Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor.
>> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.
>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite #7-500 Honolulu, HI 96813
>> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), letters@staradvertiser.com, staradvertiser.com/editorial/submit-letter