Wisconsin judge indicted for helping immigrant evade ICE

MIKE DE SISTI / USA TODAY NETWORK VIA IMAGN IMAGES VIA REUTERS/FILE PHOTO
Hannah Dugan speaks as she was seeking election to Milwaukee County Circuit Court during a forum at the Milwaukee Bar Association in Milwaukee, Wis., in March 2016. The Wisconsin judge arrested last month and accused of helping an immigrant in the country without legal permission evade federal agents was indicted by a federal grand jury today on charges of concealing a person from arrest and obstruction of proceedings.
The Wisconsin judge arrested last month and accused of helping an immigrant in the country without legal permission evade federal agents was indicted by a federal grand jury today on charges of concealing a person from arrest and obstruction of proceedings.
The indictment of the judge, Hannah C. Dugan of Milwaukee County Circuit Court, was a routine but significant step in the Justice Department’s case against her. The Trump administration has defended the prosecution as a warning that no one is above the law, while many Democrats, lawyers and former judges have denounced it as an assault on the judiciary.
Dugan, who has been temporarily removed from the bench by the Wisconsin Supreme Court while the case against her advances, has indicated through a lawyer that she intends to fight the charges. She is expected to appear in court Thursday.
“Judge Hannah C. Dugan has committed herself to the rule of law and the principles of due process for her entire career as a lawyer and a judge,” her lawyers said in a statement shortly after she was arrested. They added today that “Judge Dugan asserts her innocence and looks forward to being vindicated in court.”
The indictment was announced during a short hearing today at the federal courthouse in downtown Milwaukee. After 20 members of a grand jury entered a wood-paneled courtroom and took their seats, a judge examined paperwork and indicated that Dugan, along with other defendants in unrelated cases, had been indicted.
Dugan’s transformation from a little-known local jurist to a face of the national immigration debate began April 18 with a pretrial hearing in a domestic abuse case against Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican immigrant.
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
Several federal officials from different agencies had gathered in the hallway outside Dugan’s courtroom and had planned to arrest Flores-Ruiz, who they said was in the country illegally, after his court appearance. The federal agents had told courthouse security officers and the judge’s courtroom deputy about their plans, according to an FBI charging document.
When Dugan became aware of the federal agents, the charging document said, she became “visibly upset and had a confrontational, angry demeanor.” According to the criminal complaint, the judge confronted the agents and told them to talk to the chief judge of the courthouse. She then returned to her courtroom and, according to the charging document, directed Flores-Ruiz through a different exit than the public door that led to the hallway where agents were waiting.
“Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz, Judge Dugan then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom through the ‘jury door,’ which leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse,” according to the complaint, which was written by an FBI agent.
Flores-Ruiz made it outside the courthouse, the charging document said, where a Drug Enforcement Administration agent spotted him. Agents approached him on the street outside the courthouse. “A foot chase ensued,” the complaint said. “The agents pursued Flores-Ruiz for the entire length of the courthouse” before catching and arresting him, the complaint said. Federal agents said that Flores-Ruiz was removed from the United States in 2013 and that there was no record of him seeking or receiving permission to return.
Dugan was arrested and charged with obstructing a proceeding of a federal agency, and concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest.
The arrest of the judge marked an escalation of the Trump administration’s warnings that local officials must not impede federal efforts to deport millions of immigrants in the country without legal permission. Attorney General Pam Bondi and other administration officials have defended the case against Dugan.
“It doesn’t matter what line of work you are in, if you break the law, we will follow the facts and we will prosecute you,” Bondi said in a video.
Elected Democrats in Wisconsin and beyond have criticized the case against the judge and accused prosecutors of politicizing the situation. And earlier this month, more than 150 former state and federal judges signed a letter to Bondi calling the arrest of Dugan an attempt to intimidate the judiciary.
“This cynical effort undermines the rule of law,” that letter said, “and destroys the trust the American people have in the nation’s judges to administer justice in the courtrooms and in the halls of justice across the land.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2025 The New York Times Company