comscore Europe's migration crisis cannot be solved at sea, analysts say
Hawaii News

Europe’s migration crisis cannot be solved at sea, analysts say

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

CATANIA, Sicily » To human rights advocates, one of Europe’s biggest mistakes in the Mediterranean migration crisis came in November with the shutdown of the Italian patrol and rescue program known as Mare Nostrum. Led by the Italian navy, the program saved thousands of migrants at sea.

But ending it, largely for budget reasons, had effects beyond scaling back humanitarian efforts. Even as the Italians were saving lives, they were using the program to identify and prosecute the smuggling networks behind the surge in human trafficking across the Mediterranean. The program helped Italian prosecutors convict more than 100 people for human smuggling and indict three smuggling bosses in Egypt.

Italian ships patrolled international waters — making it possible to capture some smugglers in the act — while police investigators were stationed onboard.

"Police were able to intervene directly," said Giovanni Salvi, the chief prosecutor in Catania. "They could immediately identify the telephones that were being used, the numbers and the traffickers. We could get wiretaps. That allowed us to record conversations between the ‘mother ship’ and the bosses in Egypt."

The program that replaced Mare Nostrum, known as Triton and run by the European Union, is far less ambitious, restricted to the waters immediately off the European coast and does not include a robust law-enforcement component. The decision by European leaders not to pick up the monthly bill of 9 million euros (about $9.8 million) to keep Mare Nostrum operating has drawn scathing criticism in the aftermath of last weekend’s deadly shipwreck, which left more than 750 migrants dead.

European leaders this week effectively conceded their mistake and pledged to triple funding for search and rescue missions while also dedicating new resources to fighting the smuggling rings. But as the flow of migrants continues unabated, the new European response is being criticized as shortsighted and still lacking the scope of Mare Nostrum, which itself was never intended as a comprehensive solution.

And Europe continues to struggle with how to allocate money and personnel between saving lives on the sea, prosecuting human smugglers and dealing with the causes of the migrant surge closer to their source in poor and war-torn regions of the Middle East and Africa.

Many analysts, as well as U.N. officials, say Europe needs a more holistic response, including overhauling its asylum system and expanding channels of legal immigration, because the problem of illegal migration will only worsen.

"There was a lot of expectation from the public that the European Union wasn’t going to give just a short-term response but a medium- and long-term vision," said Thomas Huddleston, an analyst with the Migration Policy Group in Brussels. "We didn’t get that."

He added, "The real question is, ‘What is the goal of this response?’"

In Sicily, where the brunt of the migration crisis is being felt, smuggler boats have continued to arrive, day and night. On Friday, Salvi heard testimony in a closed hearing against the Tunisian man accused of piloting the boat that capsized in the fatal shipwreck, as well as a Syrian man who is alleged to have been working as an accomplice.

Salvi’s office, if more accustomed to pursuing cases against the Sicilian Mafia, now has a special team of prosecutors that works with the Italian police to confront the smugglers. Mare Nostrum, which is Latin for "our sea," was hardly a cure-all, Salvi said, but it provided investigators with the advantage of scope and immediacy. On at least five occasions, Mare Nostrum ships working in international waters seized "mother ships" — the large vessels that carry out migrants before transferring them to smaller boats in international waters.

Meanwhile, police investigations could start aboard rescue ships, as officers began questioning migrants, and identifying smugglers, as soon as people were rescued. By contrast, no police investigators were on the Italian coast guard ship that responded to the fatal shipwreck last weekend. Once the 28 survivors were rescued, Salvi sent a helicopter to the scene to retrieve a Bangladeshi survivor for questioning in Catania. In addition, investigators were airlifted to the coast guard ship as quickly as possible.

"We lost some hours — it is very important for us, those first hours," Salvi said, even as he stressed that Europe needed to stop addressing migration as an emergency. "We have to consider this a structural problem that will continue. We have to deal with this in a more comprehensive way."

In addition to tripling funding for the current Triton program, which is led by Europe’s border agency, Frontex, Europe is taking other steps to address the problem. Britain and Germany have pledged to contribute ships to participate in expanded patrolling. There is also discussion of trying to blockade Libyan ports or destroy smuggling boats before they are put to use — a proposal some analysts regard as fanciful.

"The plan to destroy smugglers’ boats is highly dubious," said Masood Karimipour, regional representative in Cairo for the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, via email. "There is no shortage of rickety fishing boats or rubber dinghies. These quick-fix tactics make for catchy headlines but are not effective and sustainable solutions."

"You can’t shoot your way out of a humanitarian crisis," he added.

The scope of smuggling operations in North Africa is immense and multifaceted, defying easy solutions, analysts say. Tuesday Reitano, a policy analyst whose has studied North African smuggling networks, credited Italian prosecutors for going after smuggling bosses. But she warned that migrant smuggling had become hugely profitable, with different militias or African clans controlling pieces of territory.

"For West Africa and the Sahel, this is the next cocaine flow," said Reitano, head of the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime’s secretariat, citing the illegal profits once made in the region’s drug trade.

The economics shifted with the civil war in Syria, because suddenly tens of thousands of affluent Syrians were willing to pay several thousand dollars, per person, for passage to Sweden or Germany. In response, Reitano said, loosely connected smuggling networks have coalesced, charging higher rates to Syrians, even as they are willing to take less from Africans, who are often overloaded onto small boats to bolster profits.

"You had huge numbers of Syrians and now, all of a sudden, there is a parallel exodus of Africans," she said. "That is not an accident."

Italian officials began Mare Nostrum in October 2013, after a disastrous shipwreck near the Italian island of Lampedusa in which hundreds of migrants died within a few hundred yards of the shore. Naval and coast guard vessels and aircraft expanded their search zone beyond Italian waters and rescued more than 150,000 migrants at sea, while assisting in the arrest of 330 smugglers, according to the Italian navy.

Political opponents of Mare Nostrum argued the program served as a "pull" factor that attracted more migrants with the promise of being rescued. Opponents in Italy also opposed the monthly 9 million euro price tag and called for the European Union to foot the bill.

European leaders refused. Instead, Frontex was placed in charge, even though its mandate does not call for search and rescue operations. The new Triton program involved fewer ships patrolling a much smaller region. Deaths at sea have topped more than 1,700, a huge spike from the same period a year ago.

Now it is unclear whether the Triton program, beyond getting more money, will also expand the territory it patrols. Huddleston, the analyst with the Migration Policy Group, described Mare Nostrum as a "game changer," because by undertaking the humanitarian mission, Italy forced the rest of Europe to confront the issue.

And even as the rescues will continue at sea, many analysts warn that efforts to simply bottle up refugees and migrants in Africa — without providing them legal channels to seek asylum — will also backfire.

"If you block people in Africa, they will continue to die," said Philippe Fargues, director of the Migration Policy Centre in Florence, Italy. "Maybe not before our eyes, but they will die somewhere in Africa. It is pure hypocrisy."

Jim Yardley, New York Times

Comments have been disabled for this story...

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up