Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
Why did the City Council pay $500,000 for outside counsel regarding pending Bill 46 and then choose to not wait for the results of the consultation? If Bill 46 passes, at least 20% of the monies collected will be used for affordable housing, and the remainder will be used for other, as yet undefined, related purposes.
Although Bill 46 is ostensibly aimed at solving our affordable housing problem, it appears more like a covert way to gain monies for the city’s coffers without offering any actual accountability. If passed, who is going to pay for the costs of dealing with legal suits against the city challenging the legality of this bill?
Surely, passing this bill is more likely to open a Pandora’s box than provide solutions to our housing problems.
We have had enough of a fiasco with our rail system to pay for; do we really need another one?
Sharon Keating
Mililani
EXPRESS YOURSELF
The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions. Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor.
>> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.
>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite #7-500 Honolulu, HI 96813
>> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), letters@staradvertiser.com, staradvertiser.com/editorial/submit-letter Opens in a new tab
