Thursday, July 31, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Fine nominees blocked by politics, justice says

By Oskar Garcia

Associated Press


Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy says the Senate confirmation for new federal judges is too political and is keeping out highly qualified candidates who don't want to go through the difficult process.

Kennedy told judges gathered in Maui that the Constitution requires Senate confirmation, but the process today is too partisan.

"This is bad for the legal system," Kennedy said. "It makes the judiciary look politicized when it is not, and it has to stop."

Kennedy, who was nominated to the court by President Ronald Reagan, isn't the first justice to criticize the current system. Chief Justice John Roberts said in 2009 that courts as a whole are concerned about politics and partisanship seeping into the judicial branch. Elena Kagan, well before she became a justice in 2010, said in a 1995 book review that Senate lawmakers had failed to engage nominees in meaningful discussions about constitutional law.

Kennedy says it's appropriate for the Senate to act politically, and for the political branch of government to have authority over lifetime appointments.

"On the other hand, there is a difference in a political function and a partisan function, and the current climate is one in which highly qualified, eminent practitioners of the law simply do not want to subject themselves to this process," Kennedy said.

Kennedy spoke Monday night before a group of several hundred judges, lawyers and other court officials at the opening session of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judicial Conference.

Kennedy defended the conference itself, which has been criticized by some Republican lawmakers who say it should be scaled back or canceled because of cost.

Kennedy said judges and others need to keep learning as part of their oath to protect Americans.

"If the American public knows, and they should know, of what we do at this conference, they would be and should be immensely proud, not only of the judiciary and the members of the academy and of the bar who are here, but of the idea of law in itself," he said.

Amid the criticism, the circuit announced last month it would delay a conference planned for next year in Monterey, Calif., to 2014.

Kennedy echoed an argument circuit court officials previously made that Hawaii is just as worthy of hosting the conference as other destinations within its jurisdiction.

"It's important that this conference meet frequently in Hawaii," Kennedy said. "There is a loveliness, even a loneliness in the Pacific that makes it fitting for us to search in quiet for the elegance and the beauty of the law."

Circuit court officials said Maui was picked for its competitive room rates and cheaper flight costs because of the number of airlines serving Hawaii. Chief Judge Alex Kozinski told lawmakers criticizing the conference that at $230 per night, the Maui hotel compares favorably with similarly sized hotels in other destinations.

The court serves Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington, as well as Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
bender wrote:
I think Kennedy should be more concerned about public perception of the legal system. For example, why did taxpayers have to fund a conference at a spa on Maui for the 9th circuit. I'm wondering how many of the mentioned several hundred attendees got a free ticket. Did Kennedy pay his own way, or did we foot the bill. The "learning" could just as easily have been accomplsihed in a more austere location.
on August 15,2012 | 09:09AM
loquaciousone wrote:
You mean like Las Vegas?
on August 15,2012 | 02:36PM
Latest News/Updates
The Green Leaf
Marine debris art

Political Radar
`Toss up’

Political Radar

Political Radar
Hilton; Plaza Club

Political Radar
Direct mail