Hawaii court interpreter service gets top national ranking
August 22, 2017 | 81° | Check Traffic

Top News

Hawaii court interpreter service gets top national ranking

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Defendant Anh Bui, left, and court interpreter Thu-Huong Crumpton, center, listen to testimony during Bui’s first-degree assault trial at Circuit Court in Honolulu Wednesday.

A national report released Wednesday ranked Hawaii’s state court system No. 1 in the country for providing support to those with limited English proficiency.

The ranking came after the U.S. Department of Justice last year closed its review of Hawaii’s language access program, saying the Hawaii judiciary made improvements that included changing the way interpreters are assigned and launching informational web pages in each of the 14 most commonly used languages that explain the right to an interpreter at no cost.

The judiciary offers court interpreters in about 45 different languages, but officials say they still struggle with finding enough qualified interpreters to satisfy the demand.

According to the judiciary, about 6,800 cases required interpreting services in 2008, and that figured jumped to nearly 7,700 in 2012. There were nearly 9,600 interpreted proceedings in 2014, the most recent year complete data are available.

“We are currently working on translating court forms from English into the 12 to 14 languages most frequently encountered in our state courts,” Judiciary Administrative Director Rodney Maile said in a statement.

Hawaii ensures court interpreters are certified and is one of only three states that require interpreters at self-help centers, according to the findings of the Justice Index by the National Center for Access to Justice at Cardozo Law School in New York City.

The rankings also placed Hawaii third for overall access to justice. The report measures accessibility in four categories: attorney access for low-income litigants; support for litigants representing themselves without an attorney; language access support and help for those with disabilities.

The center notes that the research behind the index has its limits.

“Individual courts or counties may be struggling despite well-structured rules and programs at the state level,” the center’s website says. “And individual courts or counties may be outperforming their statewide programs through their own efforts, creativity and dedication.”

6 comments

Leave a Reply

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.