Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Friday, April 26, 2024 79° Today's Paper


Top News

Progress unclear after 4½ hours of U.S.-led talks on Syria

1/1
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, left, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, right, attend a bilateral meeting where they discussed the crisis in Syria, in Lausanne, Switzerland, Saturday, Oct. 15, 2016.

LAUSANNE, Switzerland >> Back where they started, the United States, Russia and others trying to mediate Syria’s civil war spent 4½ hours searching for a diplomatic process that could succeed where last month’s collapsed cease-fire failed. It wasn’t clear whether they made any progress.

With the Syrian and Russian governments pressing an offensive against rebel-held parts of the city of Aleppo, no one predicted a breakthrough and there were no immediate claims of one. The meeting in Switzerland concluded without apparent plans for a news conference, a joint statement or anything else that might signify a success.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry led the renewed talks, joined by a familiar cast that included Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the top envoys from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt and Jordan.

“We’re working very hard,” Kerry told reporters in front of the eight other diplomats.

Days of deadly airstrikes in Aleppo prompted Kerry last month to end bilateral U.S.-Russian engagement on Syria, including discussions over a proposed military alliance against Islamic State and al-Qaida-linked militants in Syria. Last week he accused Russia of war crimes for targeting hospitals and civilian infrastructure in the Arab country.

Nevertheless, Kerry reunited with Lavrov at the lakeside Beau-Rivage Palace in Lausanne, meeting with the Russian for almost 40 minutes before the larger gathering. U.S. hopes of any diplomatic progress appeared to rest squarely on Russia’s cooperation.

Kerry also met privately with Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir.

The conflict has killed as many as a half-million people since 2011, contributed to Europe’s worst refugee crisis since World War II, and allowed the Islamic State to carve out territory for itself and emerge as a global threat.

Residents of opposition-held eastern Aleppo have faced daily violence as Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government seeks to take full control of the country’s largest city.

On Saturday, Syrian and Russian airstrikes hit several rebel-held neighborhoods amid clashes on the front lines in Syria’s largest city and onetime commercial center, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and the Aleppo Media Center, an activist collective. Also, opposition fighters backed by Turkish airstrikes launched an offensive to try to capture Dabiq from IS, which confers special status to the northern Syrian town in its ideology and propaganda.

In an interview this week with a Russian media outlet, Assad said a military victory in Aleppo would provide the Syrian army a “springboard” for liberating other parts of the country.

Despite fiercely criticizing Syria and Russia, the United States doesn’t seem to have an answer.

President Barack Obama and the Pentagon have made clear their opposition to any U.S. military strikes against Assad’s military. The U.S. is uneasy with providing more advanced weaponry to the anti-Assad rebels because of their links to extremist groups. And sanctions on Moscow are seen as unlikely step, given their limited impact after Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea territory in 2014 and the weak appetite among America’s European partners for such action.

With no apparent Plan B, Obama directed his national security team on Friday to renew diplomatic efforts to reduce the bloodshed in Syria. The White House said it hoped the larger discussions with Russia and other key governments would “encourage all sides to support a more durable and sustainable diminution of violence.”

Russia says it also wants a cease-fire, but describes the U.S. and its partners as the problem.

In an interview Friday with The Associated Press, Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s U.N. ambassador, said this weekend’s talks are focused on getting U.S.-backed, “moderate” opposition forces to break ranks with al-Qaida-linked fighters.

Given the collapse of several cease-fires in Syria in recent months, Washington doubts Moscow’s seriousness. And with rebel-held Aleppo poised to fall, potentially in a matter of weeks, there is deep skepticism that the Syrian and Russian governments want to stop the fighting just yet.

Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said he had instructed his foreign minister to make a proposal in Lausanne about fighting IS in Syria and Iraq.

Saturday’s gathering also brought together many of the major protagonists in Yemen’s war, and discussions on that are likely.

An investigation team with the Saudi-led coalition said Saturday that wrong information led to the bombing of a packed funeral in Yemen’s capital last weekend that killed some 140 people and wounded more than 600.

The U.S. struck radar sites belonging to Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis this week after a U.S. Navy ship took fire from the rebels.

6 responses to “Progress unclear after 4½ hours of U.S.-led talks on Syria”

  1. fiveo says:

    These talks are not going anywhere. Russia will support Assad because it is in their national interest.
    If the US really wants an end to the fighting, it should stop supporting the so called “moderate islamists” who really do not exist unless you are calling muslim groups such as
    Al Nusra, Al Queda, the Muslim Brotherhood and their military wing, Hamas as moderate. These groups and other affiliated groups hate the US and the West and have clearly told anyone who will listen that after they are done with Assad and his Alewite sect, they will focus their jihad on the US and the West and anyone else who do not believe in their fundamental islamic beliefs. The war would end in short order if the US stopped shipping arms and other support to these groups.

    • wiliki says:

      I think the Russians have made clear to Asad that is NOT in their national interest to support him.

      The only reason for their support is to prevent chaos like in Libya.

      • sailfish1 says:

        You are wrong – Russia wants to protect their only naval base at Tartus Syria on the Mediterranean Sea and their air force base in Hmeimim Syria. They have moved several new ground to air missile systems to Syria to protect their bases and the Syrian military bases and that should tell everyone that Russia supports the Syrian government.

  2. wiliki says:

    Good sign… the Russians want to negotiate.

    With the alliance against them, they know that any tactical advantage they have could be quickly reversed by the alliance.

    We need to remember that the Syrian government isn’t coming from a position of strength. Only the Russians and the Iranians are backing them up.

  3. saywhatyouthink says:

    Obama’s foreign policy has been an absolute disaster for our country. The US needs to stop pushing regime change all over the middle east and focus on eliminating Isis and groups like it. If only the US and Russia could work together against Islamic terrorism, muslim extremist groups would be an endangered species. Obama won’t even admit it exists, he’s more concerned about possibly offending the Muslim world than he is about protecting the lives of 320 million Americans.

  4. CEI says:

    Hey SA and AP you guys are getting off topic. You’re taking up valuable space with this nonsense when you could be exhuming a few more women who have been “abused” by Trump.

    On a more serious note much of this chaos in the mid-east is a failure to lead by Barry Hussein and his twin Sec’y of State disasters of “Waldo” Clinton and “Lurch” Kerry.

Leave a Reply