Quantcast
  

Sunday, April 20, 2014         

BREAKING NEWS


 Print   Email   Comment | View 119 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Friend saw Deedy order 5 beers before fatal shooting

By Ken Kobayashi

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 03:20 p.m. HST, Jul 24, 2013


A former college roommate and fraternity brother of  State Department special agent Christopher Deedy testified this morning that the agent ordered five beers at Chinatown and Waikiki bars before the fatal shooting at the McDonald’s Kuhio Avenue restaurant early Nov. 5, 2011.

Adam Gutowski also testified that he did not hear Deedy identify himself as a law enforcement officer before 23-year-old Kollin Elderts of Kailua was fatally shot in the chest at the fast-food restaurant.

Gutowski said his memory was hazy because he had been drinking and was so intoxicated he would not have been able to drive a car.

He testified he didn’t recall much of what was said at the McDonald’s restaurant, but recalled that Elderts said either, “You have gun?” or “You’re not the only one with a gun.”

Gutowski was called by the prosecution to the witness stand in the start of the third week of Deedy’s murder trial on a charge of murdering Elderts.

Gutowski testified he and Jessica West, his girlfriend at the time, were with Deedy the Friday evening and the Saturday early morning of the shooting.

Gutowski said Deedy ordered a single beer at King’s Pub in Waikiki before they went to Chinatown where Deedy ordered a single beer each at two more bars during First Friday festivities.

 After returning to Waikiki, Deedy had ordered two other beers at two other bars, Gutowski said.

Gutowski, however, said he wasn’t monitoring how much his friend was drinking.

He testified he recalled hearing two shots, but didn’t see Elderts getting shot.

Deedy, 29, of Arlington, Va., was here to provide security for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation conference.

The prosecution contends he was driven by alcohol and inexperience when he shot the unarmed Elderts, while the defense maintains Deedy fired in self defense to protect himself from a drunken Elderts.

The trial will resume tomorrow morning.

Circuit Judge Karen Ahn recessed the trial following the morning session because the prosecutor was suffering from cold-like symptoms.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 119 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(119)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
scooters wrote:
SO the case is about how much Deedy was drinking and NOT on the Big Boby Aggressive Action of Elderts? WOW
on July 22,2013 | 12:41PM
gobows wrote:
its the prosecution's case...."The prosecution contends he was driven by alcohol and inexperience when he shot the unarmed Elderts." They gotta prove he was intoxicated.
on July 22,2013 | 01:06PM
hapaguy wrote:
Deedy's not charged with public intoxication so actually they don't need to prove he was intoxicated to get a Murder 2 conviction. They are just trying to show Deedy's state of mind prior to the shooting. It's a narrative the Prosecution is laying out.....
on July 22,2013 | 01:20PM
gobows wrote:
Thanks for clarification.
on July 22,2013 | 02:05PM
allie wrote:
How unprofessional. Why does a federal agent drink like this and carry around a gun??? That is just not right!
on July 22,2013 | 02:16PM
gobows wrote:
he was out hunting
on July 22,2013 | 02:50PM
stingray65 wrote:
Allie, what is the difference? Drinking and driving? They do that here in Hawaii every time!! Even the Council man!!! Who provoke who? Wrong place wrong time? Guess who won the fight ? A man with a knife or with a gun?
on July 22,2013 | 03:30PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
No one won this fight. Deedy will be living in hell.
on July 22,2013 | 04:41PM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
I agree.
on July 22,2013 | 05:35PM
hapaguy wrote:
stingray65 you remind me of my grandson when I caught him and other kids throwing rocks at my neighbors house: "all the other kids were doing it" he said. My response: "Just because the other kids were doing it doesn't make it right".....
on July 22,2013 | 05:38PM
Mypualani wrote:
Nobody won.
on July 22,2013 | 06:38PM
2NDC wrote:
He ordered the beers, no mention of how many he actually CONSUMED
on July 22,2013 | 05:42PM
allie wrote:
Guilty of manslaughter!
on July 22,2013 | 02:19PM
gobows wrote:
Innocent by Self Defense!
on July 22,2013 | 02:50PM
aomohoa wrote:
I don't often agree with allie but manslaughter seems about right. As far as I am concerned that is what Zimmerman should have got too.
on July 22,2013 | 03:01PM
maya wrote:
I was with a couple of people over the weekend who thought that Zimmerman was guilty. I told them what I had read, and the specifics about the case. After hearing what I said- they changed their mind about his guilt and told me that they did not hear those specifics from the media. So, I suggest to you- look up the details of the casebefore you spout off about Zimmerman's guilt. Everyone wants to convict Zimmerman, with no idea of the evidence presented. The dumbing down of our country. A jury did listen to the evidence, and found him not guilty.Maybe you should be more informed.
on July 22,2013 | 05:35PM
junia wrote:
Its that 'Mob Mentality" most of us have hidden deep inside waiting to come out at the first chance. And the first chance is at the water-cooler at work. It makes us look cool to be with others who are ignorant and dont take the time to look at the facts.
on July 22,2013 | 08:05PM
stingray65 wrote:
gobow, AMEN!
on July 22,2013 | 03:31PM
false wrote:
aomohoa, finally some intelligence here. mahalo.
on July 22,2013 | 03:39PM
maya wrote:
Elderts was not jumping Deedy and pounding his head into a concrete sidewalk. Look at the video, Deedy was pulling at his gun at least 3 times before the final shot. Zimmerman- not guilty Deedy- guilty. And this is from a person who initially thought Elderts was at fault before I saw the McDonalds video.
on July 22,2013 | 05:38PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Not even close gobo.
on July 22,2013 | 04:42PM
RandyC73 wrote:
Crazy!!
on July 22,2013 | 09:21PM
jtamura69 wrote:
But is this a good idea to put a guy on the stand that admitted he was drunk and that everything was hazy? What a big waste of time..
on July 22,2013 | 06:42PM
lowtone123 wrote:
It doesn't matter what someone does to you or says to you. If you fire a gun and kill someone, you have to be justified in your action.
on July 22,2013 | 01:16PM
RingRing wrote:
I can only wish the fight was between an unarmed Elderts and an unarmed Deedy. It is the gun that made this a story. . . Without the gun, it would be just another scuffle between two drunks. . . Before you Deedy fans come back and start yelling, HE WASN"T DRUNK," just give it a rest. . . he was very clearly under the influence which means he has NO RIGHT to have a gun on his person.
on July 22,2013 | 01:41PM
gobows wrote:
deedy woulda gotten pounded...
on July 22,2013 | 02:06PM
stingray65 wrote:
Yes, he has the right to have a gun! They said the other guy is unarmed, he should armed himself!
on July 22,2013 | 03:34PM
false wrote:
Really, we all need to walk around armed to ward off Deedy characters, drunk and intrusive!
on July 22,2013 | 03:43PM
gobows wrote:
OR....dont try and grab the gun when someone ELSE is holding it. You MIGHT get SHOT! omg!
on July 22,2013 | 03:56PM
RingRing wrote:
The second Deedy took a drink of alcohol while packing, he became the negligent one. . . FBI policy.
on July 22,2013 | 04:47PM
hiloboy wrote:
Why are you going all Clint Eastwook here? You really think everyone should get cc permits?
on July 23,2013 | 06:02AM
false wrote:
5 beers means 5 hours to recover sometime later? Not too fat. Soppy looking mug shot.
on July 22,2013 | 03:42PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Minimum of five beers. Adam was not monitoring Deedy, but confirmed 5.
on July 22,2013 | 04:46PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
If there was no gun involved, Elderts would have been on trial, because the bigger bully Deedy would have gotten pounded.
on July 22,2013 | 04:45PM
hiloboy wrote:
Actually, I don't think Deedy would have confronted Elderts if he did not have a gun.
on July 23,2013 | 05:58AM
MoTown808 wrote:
Why on God's green earth would the case be about Eldert's? He's not the one being prosecuted.
on July 22,2013 | 02:17PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Hope the prosecutor gets better.
on July 22,2013 | 02:19PM
aomohoa wrote:
Kind of like the need for a better persecutor in the Zimmerman case.
on July 22,2013 | 03:03PM
false wrote:
With all the latest gathering of support for Martin, Zimmerman will never be free. He won't sleep well on his own.
on July 22,2013 | 03:44PM
Mana07 wrote:
Looks like it. So I guess the point is...if you drink, you don't have a right to defend yourself against an aggressive, drug using, Caucasian (can't use the H word SA will "review:) hating fine local young man ?
on July 22,2013 | 03:50PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Mana, SA is depriving your 1st amendment . Ha ole is a word in the Hawaiian language. Nothing racist about it. The English verb, f--king , is the derogatory term?
on July 22,2013 | 04:49PM
GorillaSmith wrote:
Ever notice how the race nuts seem oblivious with respect to the facts?
on July 22,2013 | 05:11PM
Rivergrouch wrote:
no law against walking around with the "big body" syndrome.........most civil people ignore that.
on July 22,2013 | 03:55PM
RandyC73 wrote:
Deedy was acting big body because he had a gun !He Shouldn't have acted like he was bad and just let it go! It had nothing too do with him!!
on July 22,2013 | 09:19PM
Hapa_Haole_Boy wrote:
If he had 5 drinks, this happened around 230am, and if they started drinking the night prior say around 8pm-- that's 5 drinks over 6.5 hrs, less than a drink an hour. Buzzing? Probably. Drunk? Doubt it. Definitely not pi $ $ a $ $ drunk.
on July 22,2013 | 12:46PM
hanalei395 wrote:
It will be up to the jury. And without a doubt .......Drunk.
on July 22,2013 | 01:35PM
hanalei395 wrote:
On the jurors' minds .....Drunk ..AND .. Armed. ............ OCCC or Halawa ......get ready for Deedy
on July 22,2013 | 02:48PM
false wrote:
Gutowski admits he was intoxicated. Did he drink alone to be intoxicated at McD's? Could he really count how many beers? If can only remember 5, what does he not remember? He doesn't seem to remember much about McD's. He only validates how much they were drinking when partners share drinking. Come one guys is it one for one? I buy you one, you buy one.
on July 22,2013 | 03:49PM
RandyC73 wrote:
No he'll and up in federal pen!
on July 22,2013 | 09:26PM
kolohepalu wrote:
5 drinks is the number he was seen ordering- unless they were attached at the hip the whole night there's a good chance he had alot more. Doesn't matter so much anyway.
on July 22,2013 | 01:43PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Adam was drunk as he claimed, but was able to say Deedy had 5 beers, lol. Does Adam remember how much he had? The Mcdonalds video shows Adam doing a comical dance for some customers. Deedy couldn't even put his slippers on seconds after he shot Elderts. Both fraternity brothers drunk like in college.
on July 22,2013 | 02:25PM
false wrote:
Yes, college action. When do they grow up?
on July 22,2013 | 03:50PM
jess wrote:
That's all the friend say he saw him order. He could have ordered more beers or had drinks bought by someone else for him. Regardless, he probably wouldn't have passed a breathalyzer had he been pulled over for drinking and driving. The legal definition of intoxicated is different from what we perceive as intoxicated. It really doesn't matter how many he had, as long as the defense can prove that he was in fact not sober.
on July 22,2013 | 03:39PM
dlum003 wrote:
Lah dah dee dah Deedy daaaaaah, lah dah Deedy daaaaaaah dee dah!
on July 22,2013 | 12:56PM
false wrote:
Don't know the melody. Hana kokolele, you gonna get it. Hana hana hana hana hana........
on July 22,2013 | 03:51PM
dlum003 wrote:
piano man by billy joel
on July 22,2013 | 04:41PM
Rivergrouch wrote:
??????
on July 22,2013 | 03:56PM
mitt_grund wrote:
Can't tell by the count. Some guys can't handle their beer. What say we invite Deedy out on the town and see what his beer capacity really is? Probably won't do it, even if he could. Fifth amendment right to not self-incriminate. Well, after he is acquitted, then. But make sure he isn't packing a gun. Don't want to find that he really hates locals.
on July 22,2013 | 01:04PM
false wrote:
If he's acquitted, does he join Zimmerman in a witness program? Is there such a thing? Acquitted get new identity or face lift?
on July 22,2013 | 03:52PM
ryan02 wrote:
Without showing a badge and identifying himself as a federal agent, he's just some guy carrying a gun who took a shot at another person in McDonalds. The victim was justified in trying to grab the gun, because Deedy had already taken a shot at him. Really, it was Deedy who was the aggressor -- first, Deedy kicks Elderts, then when Elderts punchses Deedy in response, Deedy draws a gun and shoots Elderts. And even IF Deedy identified himself (which it doesn't sound like he did), I don't think the law allows law enforcement officers to go around kicking people, then when the victims responds, to shoot them dead and claim self-defense.
on July 22,2013 | 01:07PM
palolo2001 wrote:
You are correct. We would have people shot by the police every weekend in Waikiki.
on July 22,2013 | 01:18PM
allie wrote:
every weekend?
on July 22,2013 | 02:17PM
hapaguy wrote:
Well said Ryan02....
on July 22,2013 | 01:23PM
false wrote:
We finally have team agreement. Now when is this going to be settled? How long do we have to wait? If he's acquitted what is the team going to do?
on July 22,2013 | 03:57PM
cojef wrote:
The defense has not presented their witnesses so we have had just glimpse of the trial. Let's wait and see how good the defense attorney is. So far, it looks pretty dim for Deedy, but surprises have been sprung before. Like pulling rabbit out of a hat.
on July 22,2013 | 04:20PM
Mypualani wrote:
ryan02 Some are still high on the Zimmerman case and are fantasizing that the same holds true here.Not in this case there is actual video and eyewitness testimony to the events that led up to Elderts death, also we don't have the same laws as Florida "STAND YOUR GROUND" this case has more twists and turns than a roller coaster at six flags.
on July 22,2013 | 01:28PM
gobows wrote:
be sure your seat belt is on correctly!!
on July 22,2013 | 02:07PM
false wrote:
No one gets that Zimmerman was walking around Lone Ranger style with gun drawn. Martin was taken by surprise and responded as Elderts did to protect his life. How does everyone accept Zimmerman's tale of innocence. The fight Martin put up for his life tells the whole story.
on July 22,2013 | 03:58PM
lookup wrote:
I agree, Martin was acting in self defense , only problem is He is not around to claim it. Something is wrong with the way they do things in Florida... 1st they do not even investigate the killing of a teenage boy, then they only have 6 people on the jury of such a controversial case, then the judge seems to instruct the jury on how and what they should be thinking. Funny kine to me!
on July 22,2013 | 05:46PM
Tahitigirl55 wrote:
Regardless if he showed his badge or not. He was drunk and looking for some local guy to shoot. Elderts was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Deely is quilty not matter what. Why is the court wasting our tax payers money. Just sentence him to life and that is that.
on July 22,2013 | 01:31PM
allie wrote:
true and what is with all these drunk guys anyway???
on July 22,2013 | 02:17PM
false wrote:
Exactly!
on July 22,2013 | 03:59PM
Slow wrote:
So, Tahitigirl55, that was you that night! Remember me, the guy next to you inside Chris Deedy's mind? We were there when he said to himself "I am looking for a local guy to shoot." Or maybe you like to make stuff up. Me too. It's fun. All nonsense aside, Deedy appears to deserve a manslaughter conviction.
on July 22,2013 | 07:12PM
aomohoa wrote:
Oh I think he was wrong but I do think he identified himself several times. Of course he may have just sounded like a loud mouth drunk. Who knows.
on July 22,2013 | 03:06PM
mosquito96826 wrote:
By far the most accurate post here.
on July 22,2013 | 04:03PM
BigOpu wrote:
Those are the 5 he saw. After drinking a few, do you really keep a close count on your buddy's beers? I don't. On the other hand, how can you legitimately prove drunk without field sobriety tests, breathalizer, or blood draw. That's a tough sell by Prosecution. Cops got to cover their mistake by claiming stuff like "smelt like alcohol or glazed eyes." They didn't complete their job.
on July 22,2013 | 01:25PM
Mypualani wrote:
BigOpu I agree with you. This case is so very sad indeed. I wanna see the testimony from the witness who heard the words exchanged between Elderts and Perrine.
on July 22,2013 | 01:36PM
KoloheWiz wrote:
Questions no one seems to be asking: (1) The legality (Hawaii law) of carrying a loaded concealed firearm (it was in his back pocket from the looks of the McD video) in liquor serving establishments while consuming alcoholic beverages.(2) If Deedy was in fact on call as he has stated then why was he out drinking in shorts and slippers? (3) If there had been a State Department related incident would he have been allowed to participate by his supervisor based on his alcohol consumption? This is beginning to sound like he acted more out of ethnic bias based on what he had been told by a fellow agent regarding some locals feelings towards haoles. It's kind of ironic that the behavior exhibited by the agent that told him that and Deedy's own actions are the exact reason some locals feel that way.
on July 22,2013 | 01:34PM
false wrote:
He unda cova. So secret he didn't know how to act.
on July 22,2013 | 04:00PM
HawaiiCheeseBall wrote:
Makes you wonder why the prosecutor calls witnesses who were drunk themselves.
on July 22,2013 | 01:36PM
gobows wrote:
two drunks make a drunker? is that even a word?
on July 22,2013 | 02:07PM
allie wrote:
yup..disgusting!
on July 22,2013 | 02:18PM
cojef wrote:
Drunkard, maybe?
on July 22,2013 | 04:24PM
mosquito96826 wrote:
Maybe there were ONLY witnesses who were drunk.
on July 22,2013 | 04:06PM
paradiddle wrote:
I would think the Defense will attempt to clarify the time frame when these drinks were ordered, if they were fully consumed, if there was any food/pupus consumed with the beer etc. etc etc. Drinking 5 beers over 4 to 6 hours and/or with food is unlikely to get an average size adult male drunk. Maybe a little buzzed, but not drunk. IMHO.
on July 22,2013 | 01:39PM
loquaciousone wrote:
Gutowski said that Deedy ordered five beers but can't remember anything else because he was too drunk. Funny what you remember and don't remember when you're drunk. Maybe he drank all five beers. That's why he can't remember anything else.
on July 22,2013 | 01:42PM
false wrote:
Gutowski stopped counting at five because he couldn't focus on 6.
on July 22,2013 | 04:01PM
krusha wrote:
I bet he's probably going to say he ordered 5 non-alcoholic beers. Without the blood test of breathalizer test there's no way they can prove he was drunk...
on July 22,2013 | 01:42PM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
I think that would be a mistake, unless he really was drinking nonalcoholic beer. The bars keep of record of what they sell.
on July 22,2013 | 01:58PM
krusha wrote:
Not sure about that, since they would have to have you show your ID for every drink you order and write down your name in some logbook. Doesn't make sense to do that.
on July 22,2013 | 03:30PM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
I thought they itemized and added the purchased and put them on your credit card receipt. I could be wrong. I don't bar hop.
on July 22,2013 | 06:45PM
stingray65 wrote:
I was waiting for this one. Why not the HPD give him a blood test if the cop smell alcohol? Nothing is concrete here. Glassy eyes? Anyone with wearing contact has glassy eyes, is he or she drunk? What had happen to SOP? Blood test? He could have ordered Cranberry juice!! Five drinks!! His buddy is another issue, cannot even remember any number of drinks he consumed! The only mistake Deedy did was, he give the other guy a chance to get close to him.. It has to be at least two arm length. Then decide what to do! Stay or walk away and face the consequences!!
on July 22,2013 | 03:49PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
stinkray, Deedy went to Elderts. Deedy should have kept that 20 ft. Between their table. The mistake you talk about is Deedy getting close.
on July 22,2013 | 04:57PM
hapaguy wrote:
You watch, Kailuaraised, wiliki, LDub, control, and the other Deedy supporters will come on here later to say that Gutowski never SAW Deedy drink those beers or something to that effect.....
on July 22,2013 | 02:00PM
gobows wrote:
haha....I was just thinking that too!....his buddy didnt see him swallow???...err...is that like smoking, but NOT INHALING???
on July 22,2013 | 02:09PM
stingray65 wrote:
gobow, I totally agree with you.!! However, I am sure he identified himself as law enforcement agent, only no voice in that video..He should keep the distance not to give a guy any chances to reach him.
on July 22,2013 | 03:54PM
hapaguy wrote:
THe Prosecutors Office stated in their court filing that Deedy never ID'd himself as a Federal Agent and now Gutowski testified that Deedy never ID'd himself as a Federal Agent. So how is it that you are sure he did?
on July 22,2013 | 05:33PM
localguy wrote:
Deedy has a brand new federal retirement plan in the works, 3 hots and a cot. Plus he will get to meet a whole bunch of new friends who just LOVE former federal law enforcement officers. Expect his new prison friends to show him the ropes of prison life, how to get along, night time action with his new friends. Yes, Deedy will be well taken care of in federal prison. Be afraid Deedy, be very afraid.
on July 22,2013 | 02:01PM
allie wrote:
I think he is guilty of manslaughter!
on July 22,2013 | 02:18PM
false wrote:
Not even. He isn't going camping locally at Halawa. He will be sent to a hotel for federal employees who fail their duty. He will get special treatment. Be out 3 years or less. One more degree, or PHD.
on July 22,2013 | 04:04PM
Hodad wrote:
Five beers over how many hours? If he was drinking like one an hour, I doubt he was impaired by alcohol. Jetlagged and tired, but not drunk.
on July 22,2013 | 03:05PM
false wrote:
Jet lagged and intoxicated go really well together as a cocktail for irrational behavior. Nothing fatigue to confuse the brain in a strange environment where a lot of people don't look like you. His brain was not on duty. It was fogged out from the night on the town.
on July 22,2013 | 04:05PM
Aquarius1 wrote:
Is there sufficient reasonable doubt?
on July 22,2013 | 03:20PM
false wrote:
Elderts is dead. How much more evidence is needed? All over a disparaging regard. N word wouldn't have gotten any ire. H word big problem. It's a matter of perspective.
on July 22,2013 | 04:07PM
Mythman wrote:
What university did the deceased graduate from? The federal agent graduated from an Ivy League University, an expensive one. I wonder why this is never mentioned? Could it be perceived as hurtful to the case that a rich college boy is involved and a poor local boy is deceased? Just wondering.
on July 22,2013 | 05:15PM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
I'm thinking it's because it doesn't to anyone.
on July 22,2013 | 05:47PM
GorillaSmith wrote:
There's plenty of blame to go around here. No one appears to have a monopoly on racism, arrogance or stupidity. This is truly a story with no heroes.
on July 22,2013 | 05:19PM
BigErn wrote:
Why is Elderts dead? Oh, because he's a racist instigator that tried to cause bodily harm to a federal agent. He got what he deserved.
on July 22,2013 | 09:17PM
hapaguy wrote:
No Elderts is dead because a drunk Federal Agent decided to poke his nose into something that was none of his business, he started a fight with someone that he thought he could take. Then after he realized that he was going to get the beat down of his life, he cowardly pulled out a gun and shot an unarmed man in cold blood....
on July 22,2013 | 11:19PM
2NDC wrote:
He "ordered" the beers. There's no mention on how many he actually "CONSUMED". Many times I see folks order a drink for others in their party, or at times order a drink only to "nurse" the same drink for the duration they're at a particular venue.
on July 22,2013 | 05:44PM
hapaguy wrote:
WINNER WINNER WINNER! I called it earlier that one of the Deedy supporters on here would claim that he never "drank" the beers!....I thought it would be KRAISED though....lol....
on July 22,2013 | 05:58PM
roxeee wrote:
I don't think Gutwoski remembers how many beers Deedy had. He's assuming it was at least five, since they went to five bars -- King's Pub, then two bars in Chinatown, and two in Waikiki.
on July 22,2013 | 07:02PM
Kapaho wrote:
What's the big deal about how much alcohol Deedy drank? Elderts was also drunk and high on drugs.
on July 22,2013 | 07:35PM
hapaguy wrote:
The Prosecution is just trying to show Deedy's state of mind prior to his shooting and killing Elderts. Its a narrative that the Prosecution is laying out. They really don't need to prove that Deedy was drunk in order to convict him of Murder 2...
on July 22,2013 | 08:06PM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
Wow Deedy ... with friends like that Adam, who needs enemies huh.
on July 22,2013 | 08:39PM
2NDC wrote:
All of my buddies would attest that I purchased several drinks that night, however consumed none of them. One of the perks of being the "designated driver". :-D
on July 22,2013 | 09:10PM
BigErn wrote:
It's kill or be killed. Elderts got what he deserved. Why? Because Deedy did everything by the book. He identified himself as a law officer, created space between him and the instigator, and only fired when the instigator grabbed the gun. If Deedy was on trial for carrying a gun as an imbibing off-duty officer, he'd be guilty. But he's not on trial for that. He should be found innocent, and whatever assets the instigator owned should be sold off to help pay for Deedy's defense.
on July 22,2013 | 09:14PM
hapaguy wrote:
Well "BigErn" it's obvious you have not been following this case because your comments couldn't be further from truth. Maybe you should get a clue before you post any more ignorant comments....
on July 22,2013 | 11:15PM
livinginhawaii wrote:
The fact that it has now been disclosed that he was a frat rat says much about his desire for alcohol and need to disrespect women. While he did a service to the community by dealing with a racist chronic, Deedy does need to be locked up for the remainder of his life.
on July 22,2013 | 09:44PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News