Sunday, July 27, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Court rules 'COPSLIE' license plate is free speech

By Lynne Tuohy

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 11:40 a.m. HST, May 07, 2014

CONCORD, N.H. >> If a New Hampshire man thinks cops lie, he's free to say so on his license plate, the state's highest court ruled Wednesday.

In a unanimous decision, the state Supreme Court agreed with the arguments of David Montenegro, who wanted the vanity plate reading "COPSLIE" to protest what he calls government corruption.

State law prohibits vanity plates that "a reasonable person would find offensive to good taste." But the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union argued that the law is unconstitutionally vague and gives too much discretion to a person behind a Department of Motor Vehicles counter.

New Hampshire had argued that state workers were right to deny the plate, because the phrase disparages an entire class of people -- police officers.

The justices said that state law does not define the phrase "offensive to good taste."

"The restriction grants DMV officials the power to deny a proposed vanity registration plate because it offends particular officials' subjective idea of what is 'good taste,'" the court wrote. The decision states the law is unconstitutionally vague and violates free speech rights.

The case was sent back to Strafford County Superior Court for further proceedings.

Attorney Anthony Galdieri, who argued the case on behalf of Montenegro and the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union, said he was not surprised by the ruling. "This regulation was an impermissible way to regulate speech under the First Amendment," Galdieri said.

Montenegro did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

At spirited arguments in November, the high court panel grilled state officials.

"So if a person at DMV agrees with the sentiment, he gets the plate?" Chief Justice Linda Dalianis asked.

"What is good taste?" added Justice Carol Ann Conboy, who wrote Wednesday's ruling. "That seems to be the nub of the argument."

Answering a question about whether a plate reading "COPS R GR8" would be approved, Senior Assistant Attorney General Richard Head acknowledged that two different people could come to different conclusions. Head could not be reached for comment.

Lawyers for Montenegro told the court that the accusation "COPSLIE" is a viewpoint that should be protected as free speech, not regulated and suppressed by the government.

After court in November, Montenegro -- who in 2012 legally changed his name to "human" -- said he thought police officers who might pull him over and have to type "COPSLIE" into their computers would amount to "the perfect situational irony."

He also acknowledged that he had been arrested twice but would not say what the charges were.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
loquaciousone wrote:
I wonder what this guy would do if he's car jacked and needs a cop.
on May 7,2014 | 07:04AM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
If he's carjacked, it means someone threatened him with a weapon, and they took his car. At that point, if he's still alive, he calls the police and they fill out a report.
on May 7,2014 | 09:36AM
loquaciousone wrote:
They might lie on the report.
on May 7,2014 | 10:49AM
noheawilli wrote:
Police are an "entire class of people"? Wow! Perhaps if the 99% of honest officers would put some serious heat and investigation in the 1% who are not, such a plate would not have been requested.
on May 7,2014 | 07:25AM
kiragirl wrote:
I would have a vanity plate with COPS R GR8 if I can get off with a DUI or any citation.
on May 7,2014 | 08:46AM
HanabataDays wrote:
Good verdict. There's no place for subjectivity in these matters. If the NH lege can't write a tight law, they ought to forget the whole plate-censorship effort.
on May 7,2014 | 08:53AM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
In another story that the SA somehow missed, two HPD officers caught up in the overtime scam and lying in the cover-up that stole from taxpayers and let drunk drivers skate and who were fired by HPD for their criminal behavior and misdeeds both just got their jobs back.

So the next time you blue light in your review mirror, think about who is enforcing the law.


I can see how the SA missed that story when they have stories like "Complex smoked oyster dish wins festival title" to get out.

on May 7,2014 | 09:46AM
BlueDolphin53 wrote:
The law is vague, so I'm not surprised. However, I wonder if the hypocrites at the ACLU would have defended the guy if the license plate said "minoritieslie" or "ALCUlies" and so forth. Somehow, I doubt it.
on May 7,2014 | 09:53AM
2NDC wrote:
I'm amused that there is an assistant in the New Hampshire Attorney General's office named "Richard Head". I wonder if the DMV would allow a plate with a variation of his name on it.
on May 7,2014 | 11:04AM
Breaking News
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War