comscore For punishment of elder's crime, afghan girl pays the price | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Hawaii News

For punishment of elder’s crime, afghan girl pays the price

[ AD HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS STORY ]

ASADABAD, Afghanistan » Shakila, 8 at the time, was drifting off to sleep when a group of men carrying AK-47s barged in through the door. She recalls them complaining, as they dragged her off into the darkness, about how their family had been dishonored and about how they had not been paid.

It turns out that Shakila, who was abducted along with her cousin as part of a traditional Afghan form of justice known as "baad," was the payment.

Although baad (also known as baadi) is illegal under Afghan and, most religious scholars say, Islamic law, the taking of girls as payment for misdeeds committed by their elders still appears to be flourishing. Shakila, because one of her uncles had run away with the wife of a district strongman, was taken and held for about a year. It was the district leader, furious at the dishonor that had been done to him, who sent his men to abduct her.

Shakila’s case is unusual both because she managed to escape and because she and her family agreed to share their plight with an outsider. The girl’s father’s reaction to the abduction also illustrates the difficulty in trying to change such a deeply rooted cultural practice: He expressed fury that she was abducted because, he said, he had already promised her in marriage to someone else.

"We did not know what was happening," said Shakila, now about 10, who spoke softly as she repeated over and over her memory of being dragged from her family home. "They put us in a dark room with stone walls, it was dirty and they kept beating us with sticks and saying ‘your uncle ran away with our wife and dishonored us and we will beat you for retaliation."’

Despite being denounced by the United Nations as a "harmful traditional practice," baad is pervasive in rural southern and eastern Afghanistan, areas that are heavily Pashtun, according to human rights workers, women’s advocates and aid experts. Baad involves giving a young woman, often a child, into slavery and forced marriage. It is largely hidden because the girls are given to compensate for "shameful" crimes like murder, adultery and elopement, elders and women’s rights advocates say.

The strength of the traditional justice system and the continuing use of baad is a sign both of Afghans’ lack of faith in the government’s justice system, which they say is corrupt, and their extreme sense of insecurity. Baad is most common in areas where it is dangerous for people to seek out government institutions. Instead of turning to the courts, they go to jirgas, assemblies of tribal elders, that use tribal law, which allows the exchange of women.

"There are two reasons people refuse the courts — first, the corrupt administration which openly demands money for every single case, and second, instability," said Haji Mohammed Nader Khan, an elder from Helmand who often participates in judging cases that involve baad. "Also, in places where there are Taliban, they won’t allow people to go to courts and solve their problems."

Women’s advocates fear that progress made recently against baad will fade as NATO troops pull back and money for public awareness programs dwindles.

"Baad has decreased in Oruzguan over the last two years due to a strong public relations campaign that we conducted throughout the province," said Marjana Kochai, the only woman on Oruzgan’s provincial council. "And we have been holding meetings with elders and strictly alerting them not to make such illegal and un-Islamic rulings."

The practice of trading women dates to before Islam, when nomadic tribes traveled Afghanistan’s mountains and deserts. Even today, outside Afghanistan’s few urban areas, many of these traditions have deep roots, experts on tribal justice systems said.

"For the nomads, there were no police, there was no court of law, no judge to organize the affairs of humans, so they resorted to the only things they had, which were violence and killing," said Nasrine Gross, an Afghan-American sociologist who has studied the status of Afghan women.

"Then when a problem doesn’t get resolved, you offer the only things you have: Livestock is more precious than a girl because the livestock you can sell, so you give two rifles, one camel, five sheep and then the girls they can sell this way."

The idea is that the giving of a girl to the aggrieved family as a de facto slave and having her marry a member of that family ties the two warring families together, so they are less likely to continue a blood feud, and helps compensate the family for the labor of a lost relative.

And when the girl gives birth to children, the offspring are at least a symbolic replacement for the relative who has been lost.

However, that is little comfort for the girl, who symbolizes the family’s enemy and is completely unprepared both for the brutality she will encounter because of it and for the sexual relations often demanded of her at a young age.

"The problem with baad is it doesn’t normally appease the people, it appeases them to the extent that they don’t kill someone from the other side, but not enough to treat the girl right," Gross said.

There is no official count of the number of girls given each year in baad, but in Kunar, where Shakila’s case took place, the head of the women’s office and a female member of Kunar’s provincial council said they were aware of one or two cases every month from the province and that many cases never came to light. They had not heard of Shakila’s situation.

A 2010 U.N. report on harmful traditional practices described baad as "still pervasive" in rural areas.

Interviews in nine Pashtun majority provinces with government representatives, women members of provincial councils, male elders and other prominent women heard a stream of stories of abuse, suicide and rape. They found that virtually everyone knew about the practice, many were ashamed of it and most people knew someone personally who had been affected by it.

Shakila’s family, like many in rural Kunar province, did not oppose baad, but objected that the jirga adjudicating her case had not yet issued its ruling and that Shakila had been betrothed as an infant to a cousin in Pakistan. Under the Pashtun code, the family said, she was not available to be given since she was the property of another man. (Such betrothals are illegal but common in rural Pashtun areas.)

"We did not mind giving girls," said her father, Gul Zareen. "But she was not mine to give."

Views of baad differ sharply between men and women, with more men seeing it as a way of preserving families and stopping blood feuds, and women seeing it in terms of the suffering of the young girl asked to pay for another’s wrongs.

"Giving baad has good and bad aspects," said Fraidoon Mohmand, a member of Parliament from Nangahar province, who has headed a number of jirgas. "The bad aspect is that you punish an innocent human for someone else’s wrongdoings and the good aspect is that you rescue two families, two clans, from more bloodshed, death and misery."

He also said he believes that a woman given in baad suffers only briefly.

"When you give a girl in baad, they are beaten maybe, maybe she will be in trouble for a year or two, but when she brings one or two babies into the world, everything will be forgotten and she will live as a normal member of the family," he said.

Not so, said the Afghan women interviewed, especially if she is unlucky enough to give birth to a girl.

"The woman given to a family in baad will always be the miserable one," said Nasima Shafiqzada, the head of women’s affairs for Kunar province. "She has to work a lot. She will be beaten. She has to listen to lots of bad language from the other females in the family."

Shakila’s relatives were poor laborers who lived in rural Naray district in Kunar province by a small river not far from the border with Pakistan. She went to school, played with her brothers and was a healthy child, they said. That changed after she was taken by Fazal Nabi’s family, part of the Gujar clan, a tribe in Kunar with a larger presence in Naray than the tribe Shakila was from.

During her de facto imprisonment, Shakila and her cousin were allowed out of their dark room after three months and then only so that they could haul firewood from the mountains and lug pails of water from the river. For the entire year or so that they were kept, neither girl was given a fresh set of clothes. For the first six months they were not even allowed to wash the ones they arrived in, making them into dirty-looking urchins who were that much easier for the family to hate. They were fed bread and water every other day.

"They tortured us in a way that no human being would treat another," Shakila said.

She spoke softly and hid her face when a reporter asked her about the white scars on her forehead. "When they threw me against the stone wall," she said.

Her cousin escaped first, bringing down even more brutal treatment for Shakila. She was tethered inside again and beaten. Allowed out only for prayer, she one day managed to slip out the gate. To avoid detection, she made her way through underbrush to the village where her sister lived. When Shakila appeared at her sister’s door she was so emaciated and dirty that her sister barely recognized her.

"She was almost finished," her father said. "She was so thin, she was like this," he said, holding up an index finger and shaking his head. "She cried all the time and now we are trying to feed her and she is slowly getting better."

Within hours, the strongman and his guards came looking for Shakila, searching her father’s compound, accusing him of organizing her escape and threatening to kill every man in the family.

Terrified, her father, Gul Zareen, and the other relatives said they waited until dusk and then, taking almost nothing but the clothes on their backs, escaped over the mountains, walking by night along footpaths because the strongman’s guards were watching the only road.

Now living in Asadabad, the provincial capital, because they feel safer, Shakila’s relatives said they were struggling. They left behind their few possessions and their only cow and two goats. Shakila’s father and uncle work as daily laborers, earning $4 a day when there is a job. The family’s small mud house has neither heat nor electricity, and cooking is done on a single stew pot over coals in the yard.

Longing to return to their village in Naray, the family members went to the courts to see if the prosecutor or judge could protect them from the Gujar clan if they returned. But the order they received from the police chief instructed them to look to the local police in Naray for help.

Gul Zareen shook his head. The police chief is a kinsman of Fazal Nabi, the strongman who took Shakila, he said. "We cannot go back."

Shakila looked out the window into the squalid yard. "I don’t know about my future," she said. "Whether it will be good or bad."

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature
Comments have been disabled for this story...

Scroll Up