comscore UH-Manoa Faculty Senate defers no-confidence vote on Greenwood | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

UH-Manoa Faculty Senate defers no-confidence vote on Greenwood

    20121017-1670 CTY GREENWOOD UH Manoa Faculty Senate meeting in Architecture Auditorium at UH Manoa to discuss possible no confidence vote in UH President M.R.C. Greenwood. This is Jim Gaines (left, V.P. for Research) talking with M.R.C. Greenwood before the start of the meeting where the faculty was to discuss the no confidence vote. At the beginning of the meeting, Greenwood spoke, then she immediately left. Then the faculty voted to delay the no confidence vote. PHOTO BY DENNIS ODA. OCT. 17, 2012.

The University of Hawaii Manoa Faculty Senate has postponed a no-confidence vote on embattled UH President M.R.C. Greenwood.

The senate had scheduled a possible vote for its meeting this afternoon. But the group, made up of representatives from UH-Manoa departments, decided to postpone the vote indefinitely after hearing from Greenwood and a senate committee, which recommended taking up the issue at another time.

Greenwood defended her actions after finding out about the Athletic Department’s loss of $200,000 in an apparent scam involving a bogus Stevie Wonder concert and she pointed the finger at lawmakers, who she said put “improper” political pressure on her to reverse the decision to transfer former Athletic Director Jim Donovan to a new job in the UH Manoa Chancellor’s Office.

“For me, the most important issue here is not the so-called ‘Wonder blunder,'” Greenwood said. “It is a much more fundamental concern for the independence of this fine institution.”

Greenwood said she was threatened with hearings and cuts to the UH budget if Donovan was not returned as athletic director.

“The reason I did not (keep Donovan as athletic director) was to protect the university and its independence,” she said.

Doug Vincent, the chairman of the Faculty Senate Committee on Administration and Budget, said committee members are still “deeply troubled” by Greenwood’s lack of consultation with the faculty and “patterns of behaviors.” But “there’s a lot that we don’t know yet,” and the committee would like to discuss the motion further and see if Greenwood makes progress.

“If things don’t change favorably, we would certainly consider it (taking up the motion again),” he said.

Comments have been disabled for this story...

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up