comscore Maui jury deems killing ‘especially heinous’ | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Hawaii News

Maui jury deems killing ‘especially heinous’

  • STAR-ADVERTISER / JUNE 27

    Steven Capobianco enters the courtroom during his trial for the murder of Carly “Charli” Scott.

  • STAR-ADVERTISER

    Kimberlyn Scott:

    The mother of murder victim Carly Scott said on Facebook that Capobianco “will never harm another in this community”

Jurors whose deliberations spanned nearly a month before they found a Maui man guilty of murder in the death of his pregnant ex-girlfriend took much less time Tuesday to decide the killing was especially heinous — a determination that will allow a judge to sentence him to spend the rest of his life in prison.

The jury found Steven Capobianco guilty last week of second-degree murder and arson in the death of Carly “Charli” Scott, who was five months pregnant with Capobianco’s child when she disappeared in 2014.

The panel began deliberating Dec. 1 after listening to about six months of testimony.

The second phase of deliberations involved an allegation that Capobianco killed Scott in an “especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel manner.” After briefly deliberating Tuesday, the jury agreed that it was such a case.

“He is finished,” Scott’s mother, Kimberlyn Scott, posted on Facebook on Tuesday afternoon. “He will never harm another in this community.”

The maximum sentence for second-degree murder is life in prison with the possibility of parole. The jury’s decision means that he can receive an enhanced sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole when he’s sentenced March 24.

“Killing Charli Scott was not enough for this man,” Maui Deputy Prosecutor Robert Rivera told jurors Tuesday, calling him a man without a conscience. Rivera held up Scott’s black skirt showing multiple stab wounds in the abdomen area, saying the repeated punctures show that Capobianco made her suffer.

Capobianco not only murdered Scott, but he made her suffer ”unnecessary torture,” Rivera said.

All murders are arguably heinous, atrocious and cruel, said defense attorney Jon Apo, who suggested that Scott’s death was quick. Unnecessary torture, Apo said, would have been one stab wound to make her suffer a long death.

The prosecution has a sympathetic jury, Apo said, noting one of the jurors is pregnant. The judge sustained Rivera’s objection to mentioning the pregnant juror.

“I think we got justice today,” Maui’s top prosecutor, John “J.D.” Kim said, thanking the jurors and offering condolences to Scott’s family.

Apo couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

Capobianco didn’t testify during the first phase of the trial. He told the judge last week he also wouldn’t testify during the final phase, the Maui News reported.

Even though the jury is finished with deliberations, the judge temporarily ordered them not to discuss the case with anyone other than fellow jurors or the court.

“I’m hoping that this will be of some assistance to you in resuming your normal lives,” Maui Chief Circuit Judge Joseph Cardoza said. “Out of respect for all of you, I will put in a no-contact order for the present time.”

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature
Comments (3)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • It’s really bottom barrel stuff when your defense attorney feels he has to tell the jury you stabbed your pregnant victim multiple times in the abdomen to minimize her suffering.

  • “All murders are arguably heinous, atrocious and cruel, said defense attorney Jon Apo, who suggested that Scott’s death was quick. Unnecessary torture, Apo said, would have been one stab wound to make her suffer a long death.”

    apo may recognize the danger capobianco is to society. prefacing his defense statement with the proposition that “all murders are arguably heinous, atrocious and cruel,” risked the jury hearing only the embedded reenforcement: “all murders are heinous, atrocious and cruel.” then, apo assaults the jury’s sensibilities and intelligence by the outrageous suggestion that stabbing carli scott 27 times was an act of mercy by capobianco.

    both rivera and apo paved the way for the jury to return with a finding that the murder of carli scott was heinous, atrocious and cruel allowing for a sentence of life without possibility of parole.

Scroll Up