comscore Trump must face accusations of ‘Apprentice’ contestant
Top News

Trump must face accusations of ‘Apprentice’ contestant

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

NEW YORK — A New York state judge ruled Tuesday that a defamation lawsuit brought by a woman who has said President Donald Trump made unwanted sexual advances could go forward, raising the possibility of a public airing of other allegations of sexual misconduct against the president.

The decision by Justice Jennifer Schecter of state Supreme Court in Manhattan paved the way for lawyers to seek depositions from several women who accused Trump of sexual harassment before he was elected and to subpoena Trump campaign records related to his female accusers.

Schecter rejected Trump’s argument that a state court has no jurisdiction over a sitting president. She cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allowed Paula Jones to bring a sexual harassment suit against President Bill Clinton.

“No one is above the law,” Schecter wrote. “It is settled that the president of the United States has no immunity and is ‘subject to the laws’ for purely private acts.”

The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Summer Zervos, is a former contestant on Trump’s show “The Apprentice.” In her complaint, she said Trump defamed her during the 2016 presidential campaign by repeatedly describing her accounts, and those of other accusers, as “total lies” and “made up nonsense to steal the election” — potentially for fame or financial gain.

Besides arguing that the president could not be sued in state court under the Supremacy Clause, Trump’s lawyer, Marc E. Kasowitz, had argued that Trump’s comments about the women, made during a hard-fought election, amounted to political speech protected under the First Amendment. He also had argued that Zervos was not held up to the level of ridicule or contempt necessary to prove defamation.

Schecter disagreed. She said Trump’s comments about Zervos telling “phony stories” could be construed as defamatory, suggesting she “is contemptible because she ‘fabricated’ events for personal gain.”

Comments (29)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up