The latest lawsuit against Hawaiian Electric for its role in the start of the Aug. 8 Lahaina wildfire also targets a prominent West Maui developer and landowner for alleged actions contributing to the dry and dangerous conditions that allowed the wind-driven blaze to blow up.

The suit, one of at least 30 lodged against Hawaiian Electric over the disaster, was filed Wednesday in Maui Circuit Court by Ke‘eau­moku Kapu and U‘ilani Kapu, a Lahaina couple who ran the Na ‘Aikane o Maui Cultural Center on Front Street before it burned down.

While the state, Maui County and landowner Kamehameha Schools are also named in the complaint, this lawsuit is only the second filed against Peter Martin and his West Maui Land Co., and the first to name its water subsidiaries of Launiupoko Irrigation Co., Launiupoko Water Co. and Launiupoko Water Development LLC.

The lawsuit contends that Martin and his companies made worse the dry conditions that led to the Lahaina fires by diverting streams and over-pumping Lahaina groundwater for their West Maui real estate developments.

The genesis of the problem actually dates back to the 1800s when sugar and pineapple plantations developed water diversion systems to irrigate their crops. The diversions served the plantations well, but they altered natural ecosystems and in some cases forced Native Hawaiian families off their farmlands.

The Kapu’s attorney, Lance Collins, said that when the plantations closed at the end of the 20th century, Martin and his subsidiary companies bought the land claims and its control of the water diversion systems.

But instead of continuing to irrigate large swaths of agricultural land like the plantations did, Martin developed housing subdivisions and his companies diverted much of the water to those developments, leaving vast empty tracts of land that were largely neglected, Collins said.

According to the lawsuit, the West Maui Land Co. and its subsidiaries exacerbated drought conditions in West Maui by diverting water from streams and pumping of ground water. This increased the fire hazard and “led to the devastating loss of life and property on August 8, 2023,” the suit said.

The wind-driven blaze overwhelmed the heart of Lahaina town in the deadliest U.S. wildfire in more than a century. At least 98 people have died as a result of the tragedy and more than 2,200 structures, most of them homes, were destroyed.

A Sept. 19 class-action lawsuit filed by Chardell Naki was the first court complaint to accuse Martin and West Maui Land of neglecting former sugar cane lands and allowing highly flammable grasses to move in, providing fuel for the inferno that ravaged Lahaina town.

The latest lawsuit, among other things, accuses the state and county of allowing West Maui Land Co. to place locked gates on public roads and thoroughfares in and around Lahaina.

“The locked gates contributed to the difficulties, delays, and danger that those evacuating from the Maui Fires on August 8 were forced to confront. This played a role in the traffic buildup and inability to evacuate quickly resulting in additional casualties and untold amounts of emotional and mental anguish,” the suit says.

Collins said the state Commission on Water Resource Management in 2018 ordered Martin’s companies to return sufficient flow to the streams they had been diverting. In response, his company began pumping wells close to shore and then pumping the water uphill to his housing subdivisions, he said.

In recent testimony to the water commission, Na ‘Aikane o Maui complained that the move by the Martin companies resulted in the “drying up” of Lahaina, which exacerbated the conditions that made the town vulnerable to fire.

Martin did not return phone calls seeking comment on the complaint.

Na ‘Aikane o Maui Cultural Center was a hub for West Maui’s Native Hawaiian communities, a place that affirmed traditional cultural practices and assisted families with genealogical and land claims research. It also maintained a library, map collection and museum of culturally significant objects.

As for Hawaiian Electric, the suit accuses the utility of failing to de-energize its power lines even though it was aware of red-flag conditions with high winds and low humidity that would make the tinder-dry landscape especially dangerous.

While the company has denied culpability for the Lahaina fire, a spokesperson declined to comment on the lawsuit.

“Our primary focus in the wake of this unimaginable tragedy has been to do everything we can to support the people of Maui,” said Darren Pai, manager of external communications.