Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Monday, April 29, 2024 78° Today's Paper


Top News

Patients urge Alabama lawmakers to restore IVF services

1/2
Swipe or click to see more
VIDEO BY AP
More than 150 in vitro fertilization patients gathered at the Alabama Statehouse to urge lawmakers to find some way to restore IVF services in the state.
MICKEY WELSH/THE MONTGOMERY ADVERTISER VIA AP
                                Hundreds gather for a protest rally for in vitro fertilization legislation in Montgomery, Ala. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a ruling critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatments.
2/2
Swipe or click to see more

MICKEY WELSH/THE MONTGOMERY ADVERTISER VIA AP

Hundreds gather for a protest rally for in vitro fertilization legislation in Montgomery, Ala. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a ruling critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatments.

MICKEY WELSH/THE MONTGOMERY ADVERTISER VIA AP
                                Hundreds gather for a protest rally for in vitro fertilization legislation in Montgomery, Ala. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a ruling critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatments.

MONTGOMERY, Ala. >> LeeLee Ray went through eight miscarriages, one ectopic pregnancy and multiple surgeries before turning to surrogacy in her hopes of having a child.

She and her husband found a surrogate through a matching program, and they hoped to soon transfer frozen embryos. But now that plan is in doubt as Alabama fertility clinics paused IVF services in the wake of a state court ruling related to whether embryos are children under the state’s wrongful death law.

“I’m just frustrated. We had a light at the end of the tunnel,” Ray said. She said they can’t transfer their frozen embryos to their surrogate and can’t move the embryos out of state.

Ray was one of more than 200 IVF patients who came to the Alabama Statehouse Wednesday to urge lawmakers to find a way to restore IVF treatment in the state.

Alabama lawmakers on Wednesday advanced a proposed solution in the form of extending criminal and civil lawsuit protections for in vitro fertilization services. But Republicans in their proposed fix steered clear of trying to define whether the embryos should be considered human life.

“We’re trying to find a solution … It should get the clinics back open,” Republican Sen. Tim Melson, a doctor and sponsor of one of the bills, said.

Alabama justices this month said three couples who had frozen embryos destroyed in an accident at a storage facility could pursue wrongful death lawsuits for their “extrauterine children.” In reaching the decision, Alabama justices cited anti-abortion language added to the Alabama Constitution in 2018, saying the state recognizes and protects the “rights of unborn children.” The constitutional amendment was approved by 59% of Alabama voters.

The ruling, treating an embryo the same as a child or gestating fetus under the wrongful death statute, raised concerns about civil liabilities for clinics. Three clinics announced a pause on IVF services.

Melson shelved an earlier proposal that said an embryo should not be considered a human life until implanted in the uterus.

“There’s a lot of different opinions on what’s alive, what’s viable, what’s not,” Melson said Wednesday.

Some conservative groups had expressed concern about proposals that would exclude embryos from the definition of human life. Eagle Forum of Alabama issued a statement urging lawmakers to avoid “legislation that may be in direct violation of our Constitution as well as the clear definition of human life.”

“Life begins at conception, not implantation,” Eagle Forum stated. The group urged lawmakers to find a way to let IVF treatments proceed, but also supported prohibitions around the destruction or donation of viable embryos.

Some lawmakers questioned the need to pause IVF. Republican Sen. Larry Stutts, an obstetrician who is also sponsoring one of the proposals, noted that some clinics “never closed.”

A Democratic senator said Wednesday that Republicans are not “dealing with the issues that got us here.”

“Unless we redefine this as to whether an embryo is a child — and if we don’t deal with the elephant in the room that got us to this place — we’re going to be back here,” Sen. Linda Coleman-Madison, a Democrat from Birmingham, said.

Rep. Chris England, a Democrat from Tuscaloosa, said lawmakers may be able to provide a “temporary solution” through legislation, but that a long-term solution must address the 2018 constitutional amendment.

“That amendment is essentially a personhood amendment,” England said. “It’s interesting that everybody keeps saying the decision was wrong, but the legislation doesn’t address the decision.”

Advocates are concerned that IVF will become increasingly entangled in the debate over abortion.

Barbara Collura, President of RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, said the nation is watching to see what happens in Alabama.

“This could potentially be a roadmap for other states to restrict IVF or a roadmap on how to protect IVF and family building,” Collura said.

Dr. Michael C. Allemand, said the past 10 days had been the “hardest of my career” as he had tear-filled conversations with patients that “we might have to interrupt their journey.”

“Everyone is crying. They’re crying. I’m crying,” Allemand said. “I never anticipated that we wouldn’t be able to provide standard fertility care to our patients.”

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines. Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.