Quantcast
  

Friday, April 18, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Hawaii lawmakers propose shielding celeb privacy

By Anita Hofschneider

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 01:20 p.m. HST, Feb 01, 2013


More than two-thirds of Hawaii's state senators have signed onto a bill to protect celebrities from paparazzi, giving them power to sue over unwanted beach photos and other snapshots on the islands.

The bill's author says he's pushing the law at the request of Aerosmith lead singer Steven Tyler, the former "American Idol" judge who recently bought a new home in Maui.

A representative for Aerosmith declined comment late today, saying Tyler was not immediately available.

Sen. Kalani English, a Democrat from Maui, told The Associated Press the so-called "Steven Tyler Act" will help Hawaii's tourism and film industries, encouraging famous people to come here without fear of being stalked by paparazzi.

"These are my constituents as well," English said. "Public figures have a right to reasonable privacy. There's a balance that we need to create."

The bill would open people up to civil lawsuits if they invade the privacy of public figures by taking or selling photos or videos. It defines invasion of privacy as capturing or trying to capture images or sound of people "in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person" during personal or family moments. It does not specify places where pictures would be OK or whether public places would be exempt. The bill says it would apply to people who take photos from boats or anywhere else within ocean waters.

"Although their celebrity status may justify a lower expectation of privacy, the Legislature finds that sometimes the paparazzi go too far to disturb the peace and tranquility afforded celebrities who escape to Hawaii for a quiet life," English wrote in the bill.

Longtime Hawaii media lawyer Jeff Portnoy said the legislation is vague and panders to celebrities.

"It's unnecessary, it's potentially unconstitutional and it flies in the face of decades of privacy law," he said.

He said that it's hard to know how the court would interpret the state constitutional provision for the right to privacy in terms of this bill, but that based upon privacy-related court precedents, the law would be unnecessary.

The bill has only been introduced and referred to committee; lawmakers haven't set a date to discuss it yet. While 18 of 25 of the state's senators have signed on, including the Senate majority leader, it's unclear whether the bill would stand a chance in the House.

Hawaii House Majority Leader Scott Saiki said he supports the idea of protecting celebrities' privacy but thinks the bill should be more specific.

"'In a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person' — what does that mean?" Saiki said.

He said he thinks the bill needs substantial amendments to make sure it's enforceable.

English said he believes the bill is constitutional. He said the state has a provision in its constitution to protect the right to privacy.

"Generally, we've respected people's privacy, but we have a different time now," English said.

Like other destinations, Hawaii has a steady stream of high-profile visitors. President Barack Obama vacations on Oahu once a year with his family, while Lance Armstrong escaped to the Big Island last month after a tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey in his home state of Texas.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(7)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
kds wrote:
With all the issues this State has, we are wasting time on this kind of issue? In fact, this isn't even an issue for a single Hawaii resident. And compared to the mainland, celebs have it good here. Hawaii people are generally very respectful of celeb's privacy and there are clearly less paparazzi here than on the mainland because of the travel costs. Where are our legislators' priorities?
on February 1,2013 | 12:40PM
Wazdat wrote:
Typical USELESS elected leaders, DO STUFF THAT HELPS US THE RESIDENTS..WHAT A JOKE
on February 1,2013 | 12:58PM
Mythman wrote:
This is pretty pathetic wasn't there a law against a citizen taking a photo of Joe Stalin and selling it? The last part of this sentence is a joke. Wait a minute, the whole idea of this kind of law is a joke, a pathetic joke. No body I know gives a darn when Eddie Vedder is walking around Foodland with his wife and kid shirtless, or Paris Hilton, or numerous others. Ridiculous and shameful waste of valuable legislative time. Are they this desperate for campaign contributions.
on February 1,2013 | 01:48PM
townbound wrote:
Hey Maui, you all should be very embarrassed.
on February 1,2013 | 02:37PM
Shawn211 wrote:
And these senators get paid for doing what again....????
on February 1,2013 | 02:38PM
cunfuzd4 wrote:
This is the Dem party paying for "Celebrity" endorsements during elections.
on February 1,2013 | 02:40PM
W_Williams wrote:
Those stars are fools. So is whomever introduced this bill. We have enough problems to go around and we sure don't need to waste tax payer dollars on this issue.
on February 1,2013 | 04:21PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News