Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Jury selection gets underway in federal agent's murder trial

By Ken Kobayashi

LAST UPDATED: 10:30 p.m. HST, Jul 17, 2013

A weeks-long jury selection process opened Monday for State Department special agent Christopher Deedy's trial on a charge of murdering a Kailua man in a 2011 Waikiki shooting.

Circuit Judge Karen Ahn told prospective jurors that officials expect to select a jury by May 27 and that opening statements for the trial are set for July 1.

Ahn said the trial is expected to be completed by Aug. 23.

The selection process is considerably longer than for most murder trials because of the massive media coverage of the shooting that occurred just before the start of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation conference.

Deedy, who turns 29 today, was in Hono­lulu to provide security for the conference.

He is accused of murdering Kollin Elderts, 23, with a gunshot to his chest at about 2:45 a.m. Nov. 11, 2011, at the McDonald's restaurant on Kuhio Avenue.

Deedy is free on $250,000 bail and was permitted to reside at home in Virginia, but has returned for the jury selection and trial.

Seven of about 130 prospective jurors indicated to Judge Ahn on Monday that they had never heard or seen any reports about the case.

Judge Ahn and the lawyers began questioning the rest individually about what they knew about the case and whether they could set that aside and be fair in deciding the case based on the law and the evidence.

Six days were set aside for the individual questioning.

Another group is scheduled to appear at the courthouse Monday, and a third group later this month.

Although the jury might be picked by the end of May, the judge is scheduled to go on a three-week vacation in June.

Prosecutors said Deedy appeared to be drunk after a night of drinking and bar-hopping before he became aggressive, kicked Elderts and shot him.

The defense contends Elderts was the drunken aggressor and that Deedy acted as a federal law enforcement officer in protecting himself and others.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
wiliki wrote:
Why do I have an uneasy feeling on the jury selection? Only 7 of 140 did not read the news on this case. How capable are they if they take no interest in what's happening in town?
on April 16,2013 | 05:04AM
false wrote:
And they're believable? Guess there are some people that don't read or watch news, but then how connected is their brain? It's the socialization that keeps the arteries for hardening. Hmmm. There must be some rocks somewhere that never get turned over.
on April 16,2013 | 05:40AM
RetiredWorking wrote:
wiliki, that's what has always confused me about jury selection. How do you expect to choose intelligent juror peers if they're not aware of current events in their community?
on April 16,2013 | 01:30PM
scooters wrote:
Those 7 must have just moved here. How can anyone claim that they'er that stupid.
on April 16,2013 | 09:37AM
allie wrote:
Let us get the facts first!
on April 16,2013 | 11:12AM
9ronboz wrote:
his attorney should request for a change in venue
on April 16,2013 | 02:00PM
Opelu wrote:
It is hard to imagine Deedy with all his career training, responsibilties and duties to be in a situation like this. It really is about 'choices' and maybe a few too many refreshments .....??
on April 16,2013 | 03:55PM
droid wrote:
Deedy wants to have it both ways. He claims he was serving in his capacity as a law enforcement officer, because that is the only circumstance in which he would have been allowed to carry a concealed weapon. On the other hand, he had a few drinks. That's an absolute no-no while on duty. So which is it? Was he on-duty or off? Make up your mind.
on April 17,2013 | 01:29AM
Latest News/Updates