comscore Experts: Use of robot to kill suspect opens door for others
Top News

Experts: Use of robot to kill suspect opens door for others

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

    Police checked a car after a sniper opened fire on police officers in Dallas on July 8. Dallas police were the first in the nation to use a robot to deliver and detonate a bomb to kill a suspect, but other law enforcement agencies are willing and able to follow suit, including some that even have trained for the day when they’d have to do so.

CHICAGO » Police in Dallas were the first in the nation to use a robot to deliver and detonate a bomb to kill a suspect, but other law enforcement agencies are willing and able to follow suit, including some that even have trained for the day when they’d have to do so.

The killing of Micah Johnson using a robot-delivered bomb ended a night of terror in which he shot 14 officers, killing five of them, and also wounded two civilians. Dallas’ police chief, David Brown, said the decision was made to kill the 25-year-old Army veteran with a robot because talks with police negotiators had failed and he didn’t want to put any other officers in harm’s way.

With law enforcement’s rapidly expanding access to robots that can roll into and fly over hostage situations, gunfights, chases and standoffs, experts say it’s just a matter of time before they’ll be used again to kill.

“Nobody wanted to be the first but, yeah, there is no question that it proved effective and the door is now open,” said Sid Heal, president of the California Association of Tactical Officers and a retired Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department commander.

Today, dozens of the largest U.S. law enforcement agencies have at least one robot, according to experts. And many smaller departments are just a phone call away from having access to a nearby agency’s device.

Under a federal government program that supplies excess military equipment to civil agencies, the number of agencies that have acquired a robot has climbed dramatically this year. According to a study by the Center for the Study of the Drone at Bard College, there have been 201 such transfers in the first six months of this year, which is dozens more than in any full year since 2003 and 120 more than in all of 2015.

These robots are routinely used to get a closer look at suspicious devices in a way that doesn’t endanger officers and to begin communications with armed suspects.

“They’ve been used to carry phones, note pads, and pizzas to suspects,” said Mark Lomax, executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association. One was used to help search the Orlando nightclub where a man’s shooting spree left 49 people dead and 53 others injured last month. Another was used in the manhunt for one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects and lifted the tarp on the boat where he was found hiding.

Plenty of thought has been given to additional uses.

“You are seeing at trade shows robotic systems that are mounted with things like tear gas launchers,” said Peter Singer, who has studied and written extensively on the technology and warfare, and the author of “Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century.”

In Illinois, the Cook County Sheriff’s Police Department has two robots equipped to disable and even kill suspects.

“Our robots can fire less lethal projectors like bean bags, they can fire a Taser if need be or a lethal 12-guage shotgun round,” said Brian White, the department’s first deputy chief of police. White said he wouldn’t hesitate to order the robots to fire at suspects if a situation merited.

“I thought that was a quick way to mitigate the public safety threat to Dallas residents and the other officers who were there,” he said.

Others said they considered the approach for the same reason Brown used one in Dallas: to save lives.

Heal, for example, said there was discussion within the L.A. sheriff’s department about using robots to kill suspects more than a decade ago.

Michael Bouchard, the sheriff of Oakland County, Michigan, said he considered doing so during a 2012 standoff in which a man killed a police officer before barricading himself inside a building. He said the man shot three robots that were sent in and that he ultimately decided to use heavy equipment to tear down part of the building, allowing officers to fire tear gas into it before the man killed himself.

He stressed that he acted as he did for safety reasons and not because of any reluctance to using a robot as a bomb-delivery device.

“He’d already killed a cop and he was hitting homes with automatic gunfire so, yes, we decided that as a last resort we would have done that,” Bouchard said.

While Brown was widely praised for his decision in Dallas, some have expressed misgivings.

“If lethally equipped robots can be used in this situation, when else can they be used?” said Elizabeth Joh, a University of California at Davis law professor who has followed U.S. law enforcement’s use of technology. “Extreme emergencies shouldn’t define the scope of more ordinary situations where police may want to use robots that are capable of harm.”

Comments (7)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • Journalists need to be careful before adopting another journalist’s erroneous term and spreading it even farther afield. “Robots” are autonomous machines. This, like all similar police hardware, is an “ROV” (Remotely Operated Vehicle) controlled at all times by a human. In that respect it’s really no different from a landlocked “drone”. It’d be a better comparison to say that (to the public’s knowledge), drones have never before been used within the US to kill a subject.

    If this really were a “robot”, then God help us, we’d have already violated Asimov’s First Law (q.v.). I hope we never become so insecure and frightened as to do that. It’s a perilous line to cross.

    More to the point is the use of military ordnance (C-4 explosive made into a “bomb”) to kill this subject. The real question is whether police should have access to, and be able to employ, military ordnance. I vote no.

    Anyway, there already is a precedent for police killing civilians with bombs. In 1985, the Philly police helicopter dropped two bombs on a rowhouse that was the home and headquarters of the MOVE movement. These bombs killed 11 — including five children and the ensuing fire burned down 65 additional buildings and left 250+ people homeless.

    So it seems that Assad, with his helicopter-dropped “barrel bombs”, was simply following in our footsteps 30 years late.

    • Great, informative post. Thanks.

      It seems that operator controlled drones with explosives or firearms will be very lethal and effective, but easily adopted for crime as well.

      Perhaps even small, nimble micro-drones capable of delivering a tranquilizer dart or aeresol could be cheap, portable and effective.

  • Saving innocent lives is priority one and if the perp(s) is beyond reason and circumstances prevents a sniper’s bullet and it doesn’t damage infrastructure…as NIKE would say…DO IT.

  • Cheapest way out of dire situation where more lives may be lost, and easy way out of arresting, questioning, charging, trying, sentencing and finally incarcerating the prisoner. Possible lengthy judicial petition to escape death penalty and carrying out the final sentence. Least exposure for officer safety and general public. Political correctness be damn?

    • True, but beware the slippery slope from common-sense justification, to questionable use, to misuse. This can lead to more suffering and death than was intended to prevent in the first place.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up