comscore House GOP eyes food stamp overhaul | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

House GOP eyes food stamp overhaul

WASHINGTON >> House Republicans are laying the groundwork for a fresh effort to overhaul the nation’s food stamp program during Donald Trump’s presidency, with the possibility of new work and eligibility requirements for millions of Americans.

The GOP majority of the House Agriculture Committee is releasing its two-year review on Wednesday. It stops short of making specific policy recommendations, but it does hint at areas that congressional Republicans could focus on with their GOP monopoly under Trump: strengthening current work requirements and perhaps creating new ones, tightening some eligibility requirements or creating new incentives to encourage food stamp recipients to buy healthier foods.

“There’s nothing off the table when it comes to looking at solutions around these areas where we think improvements need to be made,” House Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway, R-Texas, said in an interview with The Associated Press.

The food stamp program, called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, now serves about 43.6 million people and cost $74 billion in 2015. Participation in the program rose sharply as the country suffered a recession, and the program now costs roughly twice what it did in 2008.

The report is based on 16 House Agriculture Committee hearings and lays out several findings, including that better enforcement of some SNAP work programs is needed in some states and that 42 states use broad eligibility standards that some Republicans have criticized as too loose. It also encourages more incentives to get people to buy healthy food with their food stamp dollars, addressing criticism that recipients use taxpayer money to buy junk foods. The report cites USDA data showing that 10 percent of foods typically purchased by SNAP households are sweetened beverages.

It’s unclear how or when an overhaul could happen. Food stamp policy is included in a wide-ranging farm bill every five years; the next one is due in 2018. It could also be part of a larger effort headed by House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to tackle welfare or entitlement reform, if that should happen in the next Congress.

Still, food stamp reform has always been a hard sell in Congress. Democrats almost unilaterally oppose any changes, and some Republicans from poorer districts are also wary. The 1996 welfare law added some new work requirements, but Congress declined to convert federal food stamp dollars into block grants for the states, a move that would cut spending for the program.

In 2013, House Republican leaders tried to cut the program by 5 percent annually by passing broad new work requirements as part of the last farm bill. The House bill also included drug testing for recipients.

The then-Democratic Senate balked, though, and the final bill included a much smaller cut and no allowances for drug testing.

Conaway said he’s open to any of those policies, but suggested that block granting the program — a past priority for Ryan — or drug testing recipients are not his priorities.

“We don’t want to be helping folks on drugs, but then again, folks on drugs have children,” Conaway said.

On block granting, Conaway said it’s not off the table, but not a top priority.

“We want to be more focused on getting people off the program and into successful lives and on their own two feet as opposed to being focused on how many people are there, how much money we’re spending,” he said.

He said the report should help lawmakers be “not as knee-jerk reactionary as they have been in the past.” The 2013 effort didn’t resonate well, he has said, because Republicans didn’t spell out why it was necessary.

Part of the calculation will be what Ryan proposes. He strongly supported block granting food stamps as part of his larger plans for welfare reform when he was chairman of the House Budget Committee. But an agenda he released earlier this year after becoming speaker was vaguer, only suggesting that some food aid programs could be consolidated.

As for Trump, he’s said little about what he’d want to do with the program. But he has frequently mentioned how the rolls have increased since President Barack Obama took office.

Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts, the Republican chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, was heavily involved in the 1996 welfare reform. He has said his committee will review the food stamp program, but hasn’t made any specific proposals.

He says block grants would face significant opposition in the Senate, and he’s not sure whether new work requirements would pass muster, either.

“To be determined,” he said.

Comments (5)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • The headline should read, ” House GOP eyes food stamp cuts.” So now it begins: The GOP will cut government “entitlement” programs, including welfare programs, the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), social security, Medicare, and federal retirement benefits (except their own benefits), programs many Trump voters depend on. (Also see, “Federal Jobs, Benefits, Face GOP overhaul” on page A3 of today’s SA.) At the same time the Pentagon budget will increase and taxes for the wealthy and corporations will be cut. The GOP will continue to claim that these tax cuts will stimulate the economy in the name of trickle-down economics, a.k.a. Reagan-omics or voodoo economics. As those who voted for Trump and the GOP realize they’ve been had, it will be interesting to see how the GOP blames the Democrats since the GOP controls the White House and Congress.

    • So now it begins. Great. Long overdue. We have far too many able-bodied people living on government handouts. The focus should be on getting people back to work, if they have ever been there, and off the dole, and paying taxes instead of living off taxes. There should be plenty of jobs available when illegal immigrant make a bee line to the border. The Times They Are A-Changin’

  • Its about time. If you have any reservations about EBT abuse, venture out to Sam’s club or Costco on the 4th or 5th of the month. You will see many wagons loaded with mostly rubbish. It is entirely to easy to get and maintain government assistance. The problem is , there isn’t a cutoff date. People believe they are entitled to it for life. This is what needs to change. Democrats love to talk about their great economy and 4. whatever unemployment, but the amount of money spent on food assistance doubled during Obama’s regime. It should have been cut in half, not doubled.

    • “14.7 million people were added to the food-stamp rolls during George W. Bush’s time in office. By comparison, the net gain under Obama now stands at just under 13.4 million — and it’s slowly declining as the economy improves.” (Jan 12, 2016). When one wants to make up stuff, it’s really important to pick things to make up that can’t be checked in two clicks. Better to say things like “Obama’s father was from Mars and wants a one solar system government.” That’s much harder to fact-check.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up