Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Saturday, December 14, 2024 77° Today's Paper


Top News

Fact check: No evidence that media ignores terror attacks

ASSOCIATED PRESS

President Donald Trump saluted a Marine honor guard as he disembarked from Marine One upon arrival at the White House in Washington, Monday, from a trip to Florida.

WASHINGTON >> President Donald Trump made an unsupported assertion Monday that terrorist acts in Europe are going unreported. A look at the matter:

TRUMP: “All over Europe it’s happening. It’s gotten to a point where it’s not even being reported. And in many cases the very, very dishonest press doesn’t want to report it. They have their reasons, and you understand that.”

THE FACTS: Trump and his team have cited only one example of a deadly terrorist attack anywhere going unreported, the one that didn’t happen in Bowling Green, Kentucky. Adviser Kellyanne Conway spoke about a Bowling Green “massacre” that didn’t take place, correcting herself when she was called out on the error.

As for Trump’s claim about Europe, it’s probably true that you haven’t heard of every attack on the continent that can be tied to terrorism. Scores if not hundreds happen every year. Many don’t rise to the level of an international audience because they cause no casualties, or little or no property damage, or are carried out by unknown assailants for unclear reasons.

One exhaustive list is the Global Terrorism Database, maintained by the University of Maryland. It lists 321 episodes of suspected or known terrorism in Western Europe alone in 2015. Many are anti-Muslim attacks against mosques, not the brand of terrorism Trump has expressed concern about. Many are attacks undertaken for right-wing or left-wing causes that have nothing to do with Islamic extremism or xenophobic attacks on mosques.

Among examples from 2015 that were largely under the radar of Americans:

—On Oct. 24, assailants set fire to the residence of a Socialist Justice Party member in Gothenburg, Sweden, one of series of attacks against the party that day.

—On Sept. 13, assailants set fire to the Whitton Methodist Church hall in Richmond, England, with no reported casualties and no one immediately claiming responsibility.

—On Jan. 17, gunmen opened fire on patrons at a bar in Londonderry, Northern Ireland, causing no casualties. Dissident Republicans were thought to have been behind the attack.

The database defines a terrorist act as one aimed at attaining political, religious, social or economic goals through coercion or intimidation of the public, outside acts of war.

The devastating attacks by Islamic extremists that year are also on the list, among them the murderous assault on the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, and the even bloodier attack at Paris’ Bataclan concert hall, the worst in a series of killings in one day. Those attacks and other deadly ones in Europe received saturation coverage for days.

But even the smaller, non-lethal acts of terrorism received coverage: The database itself is built from media reports.

THE WALKBACK

Trump made his claim before a broad audience on live television, while speaking at Central Command headquarters in Florida.

On Air Force One, before a smaller audience, Trump spokesman Sean Spicer said Trump did not really mean that terrorist attacks received no coverage. Trump’s actual complaint, he said, was that such acts don’t get enough attention.

“He felt that members of media don’t always cover some of those events to the extent that other events might get covered,” Spicer said. “Like a protest gets blown out of the water, and yet an attack or a foiled attack doesn’t necessarily get the same coverage.”

The White House later released a list of 78 worldwide attacks it described as “executed or inspired by” IS. Most on the list did not get sufficient media attention, the White House said, without specifying which ones it considered underreported.

Attacks on the list that had high death tolls were given blanket coverage, such as the Brussels bombings in March, the San Bernadino, California, shootings in December 2015, and the Paris attacks in November 2015. Some with a smaller death toll, such as two attacks in Canada that killed one soldier each, were covered at the time and well known.

The White House did not point to any examples supporting Trump’s contention that terrorist attacks were “not even being reported.” Less than half of the 78 incidents the White House listed occurred in Europe.

Associated Press writer Darlene Superville contributed to this report.

16 responses to “Fact check: No evidence that media ignores terror attacks”

  1. latenightroach says:

    Sorry SA this is not a perfect world.

  2. bsdetection says:

    Those ties must come from the Ringling Brothers Circus going-out-of-business sale, a place where his bizarrely dyed hair and reverse-raccoon eye makeup would fit in nicely.

  3. retire says:

    You can’t believe the press or the government in any country, including ours, so it’s best not to listen them at all, they just ruin what would otherwise be a lovely day in most cases.

  4. skinut says:

    In other words, just more of trump’s lies. Between him, spicer and conway, everything coming out of this administration needs to be fact-checked.

  5. DPK says:

    There are no unbiased news sources. An informed person reads/views information from several different sources across the political spectrum, then develops their own viewpoint.

    • Jonas says:

      I agree, DPK. The problem is that most people just get their info from one source – the one that aligns with their own bias.

    • retire says:

      Personally, I read the Economist every week, at least when the express an opinion on a topic, they identify it as such.

    • jusris says:

      IRT DPK: It seems you got it backwards, for BOTH sides these days it starts with THEIR viewpoint THEN read/views things that support THEIR viewpoint…How often do their viewpoints change after reading something that opposes their original viewpoint??? #MAGA

      • DPK says:

        IRT juris: I guess your comment points to the limitations of people blindly following party dogma. Hopefully, there are more independent thinkers out there.

        • jusris says:

          IRT DPK: Yes, i hope there is too…But don’t we all THINK we are independent thinkers??? Who actually ADMITSto being one sided??? How many people try to see the others point of view??? #MAGA

  6. ready2go says:

    When are they going to start working? It’s been 2 weeks and nothing is moving. Just got into office and already flying down to Florida for a weekend vacation and attending social gatherings are wasting tax payers money. How much did it cost us?

  7. Dai says:

    He is masterful at having everyone focus on the “birdie”. This is all timed to the immigration ban. He is taking it to court and wanted to instill fear in everyone. All that was needed to do was to increase/redo the vetting process and not implement a ban.

    • jusris says:

      Poll: Whose MORE scared??? Trumpers being attacked from enemies outside America (ISIS, Mexico, Refugees) OR Liberals being attacked from enemies within America (Trump and Co.)

Leave a Reply