Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Thursday, April 25, 2024 71° Today's Paper


Top News

Judge denies request to halt Dakota Access pipeline work

1/3
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Trash was seen piled in a dumpster at an encampment set up near Cannon Ball, N.D., Wednesday, for opponents against the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline.

2/3
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Razor wire and concrete barriers protected access to the Dakota Access pipeline drilling site, Thursday, near Cannon Ball, North Dakota.

3/3
Swipe or click to see more

ASSOCIATED PRESS

A June 2012 photo provided by ALM shows U.S. District Judge James “Jeb” Boasberg in Washington, D.C. Boasberg is overseeing a lawsuit filed by the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Sioux, two Dakotas tribes who maintain the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline to carry North Dakota oil to Illinois threatens their drinking water and cultural sites.

WASHINGTON >> A federal judge today rejected a request by two American Indian tribes for an emergency order halting construction of the remaining section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, in Washington, D.C., said that as long as the oil isn’t flowing through the pipeline, there is no immediate harm to the Cheyenne River and Standing Rock Sioux tribes, which are suing to stop the project. But he said he’d consider the arguments more thoroughly at another hearing on Feb. 27.

The tribes requested the temporary injunction last week after Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners got federal permission to lay pipe under a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota. That’s the last big section of the $3.8 billion pipeline that would need to be constructed before it could carry oil from North Dakota to Illinois.

The tribes say the pipeline would endanger their cultural sites and water supply. They added a religious freedom component to their case last week by arguing that clean water is necessary to practice the Sioux religion and that the mere presence of the pipeline renders the water impure.

At the hearing, though, Boasberg said the harm to the tribe apparently would come from the pipeline being turned on and the oil flowing through it, not from the pipeline’s mere presence.

Energy Transfer Partners received final approval from the Army last week to lay pipe under the reservoir and to complete the 1,200-mile pipeline, which would move North Dakota oil to a shipping point in Illinois. Drilling work began immediately under Lake Oahe, which is the water source for both tribes.

The company’s attorneys filed court documents early today urging Boasberg to reject the tribes’ request, calling the new religious freedom argument “exceedingly tardy,” ”not construction-related” and a “last-minute delay tactic.”

“Dakota Access has the greatest respect for the religious beliefs and traditions of (tribes). The emergency relief sought here simply is not necessary to protect the exercise of those beliefs or preserve those traditions,” wrote William Scherman, an attorney for the company.

The Corps also filed court documents today arguing that a work stoppage isn’t warranted, saying the tribes will have plenty of time to make their case before oil flows through the pipeline.

Work under Lake Oahe had been held up in the courts until President Donald Trump last month instructed the Army Corps of Engineers to advance construction. The Army is involved because its engineering branch manages the river and its system of hydroelectric dams, which is owned by the federal government.

The drilling work is expected to take about two months. The full pipeline system could be operational within three months.

Energy Transfer Partners maintains that the pipeline is safe and disputes that cultural sites have been affected. But an encampment near the construction in southern North Dakota drew thousands of protesters last year in support of the tribes, leading to occasional clashes with law enforcement and nearly 700 arrests. The camp has thinned to fewer than 300 people, but law enforcement officers continue to maintain a presence in the area.

Associated Press writer Blake Nicholson in Bismarck, N.D., contributed to this report.

7 responses to “Judge denies request to halt Dakota Access pipeline work”

  1. sarge22 says:

    The tide is turning. George Soros and the tree huggers going down. Great day in America.

  2. dcontributor says:

    So-called.

  3. ehowzit says:

    WHY NOT RE-ROUTE PIPELINE UP AND OVER THE RIVER?

  4. Marauders_1959 says:

    Finally… sensible decision from the bench.
    A decision not influenced by “public opinion”.

  5. nalogirl says:

    The land is sacred?! Did you see how much trash was left behind fir the government(taxpayers) to clean it up.

    • NP5491 says:

      nalogirl> No sympathy for them at all. I wish they continued to stay there in the freezing weather. I’ve been there and it gets COLD. Disrespectful of the land that they so much wanted to protect. Leaving their trash is a sign that they were there in spirit only. Lose money (our money).

Leave a Reply