comscore Flashback: The Anita Hill hearings compared to today | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
News

Flashback: The Anita Hill hearings compared to today

  • NEW YORK TIMES

    Anita Hill testifies during the Clarence Thomas harassment hearings in Washington, Oct. 11, 1991. As nominees to the Supreme Court, Judges Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh were accused of sexual misconduct. Justice Thomas now sits on the bench while Kavanaugh’s future has not been decided.

  • NEW YORK TIMES

    Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas harassment hearings in Washington, Oct. 11, 1991. As nominees to the Supreme Court, Judges Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh were accused of sexual misconduct. Justice Thomas now sits on the bench while Kavanaugh’s future has not been decided.

  • NEW YORK TIMES

    Judge Clarence Thomas during his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings in Washington, Oct. 11, 1991. As nominees to the Supreme Court, Judges Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh were accused of sexual misconduct. Justice Thomas now sits on the bench while Kavanaugh’s future has not been decided.

  • NEW YORK TIMES

    Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, testifies during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Sept. 4. As nominees to the Supreme Court, Judges Clarence Thomas and Kavanaugh were accused of sexual misconduct. Justice Thomas now sits on the bench while Kavanaugh’s future has not been decided.

As nominees to the Supreme Court, Judges Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh were both selected by Republican presidents to replace retiring justices. Both attended Yale Law School and were judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. And both were accused of sexual misconduct.

Thomas now sits on the bench while Kavanaugh’s fate, nearly 27 years later, is yet to be decided.

Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee convened to hear allegations of sexual assault made by Christine Blasey Ford against Kavanaugh, dating back to when they were both teenagers. Two other women, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick, have also publicly accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct but were not scheduled to testify in front of the committee.

The following is a comparison of events leading up to today’s hearing and the hearings in 1991.

The Accusers and the Claims

1991: Anita F. Hill

“He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes. He talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts. On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.” — Hill said in her testimony.

At the time of the hearings in 1991, Hill was a law professor at the University of Oklahoma. Hill was born and raised in Oklahoma, attended Oklahoma State University and graduated from Yale Law School.

She said that Thomas made repeated overtures to her, which she rebuffed, while she was working for him in the Education Department and at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Hill came forward after she was contacted by a Senate staff member who was investigating Thomas’ background.

2018: Christine Blasey Ford

“I was pushed into a bedroom and was locked in the room and pushed onto a bed. Two boys were in the room. Brett laid on top of me and tried to remove my clothes while groping me. He held me down and put his hand on my mouth to stop me from screaming for help.” — Blasey wrote in a letter.

Blasey, who is also known by her married name of Ford, is a professor at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at Stanford University’s medical school. She grew up in the Washington suburbs and attended Holton-Arms, an elite high school for girls.

Women at Blasey’s high school often socialized with students from other private schools in the area, including Kavanaugh’s school. Blasey’s claim stems from a party she believes occurred in 1982, when she and Kavanaugh were both high school students.

Blasey sent a letter detailing her allegations to the office of Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., her congresswoman, but asked for confidentiality. Eshoo’s office forwarded it to Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the ranking Democratic member on the Judiciary Committee. Feinstein released a statement after the initial round of hearings was completed, saying she had referred a matter involving Kavanaugh to the FBI, but did not give details about who or what it entailed. Days later, Blasey gave an interview to The Washington Post, revealing her identity and describing the claims.

The Nominees

1991: Judge Clarence Thomas

Nominated by President George H.W. Bush to replace retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall, Thomas was on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He grew up poor in Jim Crow-era Georgia and moved in with his grandparents in Savannah when he was 7, the first time he lived in a house with a toilet.

Thomas credits his grandfather for his success in encouraging hard work and his continuing education. He attended the College of the Holy Cross and Yale Law School.

Thomas worked in the Reagan administration, first in the Education Department and then at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

2018: Judge Brett Kavanaugh

President Donald Trump selected Kavanaugh to fill the seat vacated by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who retired in July. Kavanaugh, whose mother was also a judge, attended Georgetown Preparatory School, an elite all-boys high school in the Washington suburbs, and then Yale University for his undergraduate studies and law school.

Pages from Kavanaugh’s 1982 calendar, which he released in response to Blasey’s claims, show his summer days were often spent at the beach, going to movies, working out or hanging out with his friends.

He was a member of the team, led by Ken Starr, that investigated President Bill Clinton for his affair with Monica Lewinsky and later worked in President George W. Bush’s administration. Like Thomas, Kavanaugh was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The Cultural and Political Climate of the Accusations

1991

The image in 1991 of the Senate Judiciary Committee — all white men — repeatedly asking an African-American woman to answer, in graphic detail, questions about sexual harassment prompted outrage and inspired a wave of women, including a young Dianne Feinstein, to run for office. The next election, in 1992, was dubbed the “year of the woman” for the number of women elected to become senators.

2018

The downfall of powerful figures like Harvey Weinstein, Charlie Rose and Bill O’Reilly after allegations of sexual misconduct brought the #MeToo movement center stage. The cultural moment has given victims of sexual assault a heightened platform from which to speak out. For the accused, the level scrutiny in “he said, she said” moments is at an all-time high and the traditional burden of proof has shifted.

At the same time, today’s hearing came just weeks before a midterm election with a record number of women running for the House and Senate. The election could alter the balance of power in Washington that is experiencing a fiercely polarized climate since the election of Trump.

The Judiciary Committee

Three members of the Judiciary Committee now were also on the panel during Thomas’ confirmation hearings: Sens. Chuck Grassley — the current chairman — Orrin Hatch and Patrick Leahy.

This time around, Republicans opted to bring in an outside litigator who specializes in sexual crimes, Rachel Mitchell, to question Blasey. The move allowed the 11 Republicans on the committee — all white men — to avoid the optics on national television of them grilling Blasey. Democratic senators on the committee, some of whom are considered likely 2020 presidential candidates, questioned Blasey.

How the Nominees Responded

1991

“From my standpoint as a black American, as far as I’m concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks.”

2018

“This confirmation process has become a national disgrace. The Constitution gives the Senate an important role in the confirmation process. But you have replaced ‘advice and consent’ with ‘search and destroy.’”

The result

1991

Thomas was confirmed by a vote of 52-48.

2018

The Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a vote on Friday morning to move the confirmation process to a full vote. Kavanaugh’s fate is still in question.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature
Comments (1)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Scroll Up