comscore Medical marijuana reduces prescription drug use, study finds
Top News

Medical marijuana reduces prescription drug use, study finds

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

    Medical marijuana grows at a private property along the McKenzie River east of Springfield, Ore. on June 2.

Patients fill significantly fewer prescriptions for conditions like nausea and pain in states where medical marijuana is available, researchers reported today in one of the first studies to examine how medical cannabis might be affecting approved treatments.

Prescriptions for all drugs that treat pain combined, from cortisone to OxyContin, were nearly 6 percent lower in states with medical marijuana programs. Anxiety medication was 5 percent lower.

The result was a drop of more than $165 million in health care spending in states that had medical marijuana programs running in 2013, according to the analysis of national Medicare data. The savings would equal 0.5 percent of the entire Medicare program’s drug budget if medicinal cannabis was available in every state, the authors projected.

For years, lawmakers in state after state have approved medical marijuana programs after pleas from desperate patients. The debates centered largely on the limited evidence of benefit and concerns about harm and abuse. There was little discussion of how medicinal cannabis would change treatments that patients were already receiving.

The new study, published today in the journal Health Affairs, is one of the first to hint at that effect.

“When states turned on a medical marijuana law,” use of treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration went down, said senior author David Bradford, a health economist at the University of Georgia, “suggesting that they were substituting something else — and the plausible thing that they would be substituting was marijuana.”

Although the relationship may seem obvious, he and others made clear that the associated trends do not prove cause and effect. Nor can they suggest whether substitution would be a good thing or a bad thing overall.

“Let’s say a patient comes to my office saying, ‘I’m using marijuana to sleep because your drugs didn’t work for me.’ He tells me he is using marijuana because it really helps him sleep and his antidepressant isn’t working — ‘and by the way, I’ve flunked out of school,’” said J. Michael Bostwick, a psychiatrist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

While there is some evidence that medical marijuana can be helpful for certain conditions, Bostwick said, “you may need to decide whether you want your degree or your drug, and that’s not addressed” by the new study, which he nevertheless called “ingenious.”

To measure the effect of medical marijuana programs, the researchers examined prescriptions filled in the Medicare Part D program in the 17 states plus the District of Columbia that had legalized medicinal cannibis through 2013, compared with those that had not. They analyzed prescriptions for hundreds of drugs that can be used to treat nine conditions for which there is some evidence of benefit from marijuana. More than one condition may be present in some diseases, like HIV.

For glaucoma and spasticity, the average number of daily doses prescribed by each physician was too small to determine a difference. But all the others were significantly lower in the states with medicinal cannabis: anxiety, depression, nausea, pain, psychosis, seizures, and sleep disorders.

By contrast, there was no difference for four classes of drugs that have no impact on conditions that may be treated by medical marijuana, such as blood-thinners and antibiotics.

The findings were no surprise to Peter Rosenfeld, 61, of Collingswood, N.J., who has struggled with a degenerative spine condition for decades. When New Jersey’s medicinal cannabis program began three years ago, he tried 10 different strains before settling on one, known as Ghost OG.

About an eighth of an ounce a month, administered a few times a week through a vaporizer, reduces the spasticity, pain and dizziness better than the prescription drugs that he used to take, said Rosenfeld, a retired aerospace researcher: “It is just a good balance of effectiveness and lack of side effects.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf signed the state’s new program into law in April but it will not be operational for more than a year. Until it is, Louann Speese has been getting three cannabinoids — CBD, THCA, and THC, each given orally in an oil — sent from different dispensaries in other states for her severely autistic 19-year-old daughter.

Diana Louann Stanley’s seizures now last no more than a minute, down from five to 20 minutes, her mother said. “Now she is more aware of her surroundings. She has eye contact, which she never had before,” said Speese.

Her daughter no longer needs two anti-epileptic medications, Banzel and Lamictal. And while the $150-a-month worth of cannabis has been provided largely by donations through her daughter’s Facebook page, the cost is “a lot cheaper than pharmaceuticals,” said Speese, who lives near Mechanicsburg.

The new study’s estimates of Medicare cost savings from medicinal cannabis programs did not take account of out-of-pocket spending for the marijuana, which is not covered by insurance and is unlikely to be for a long time. Although 24 states plus D.C. have passed programs, the substance remains illegal under federal law, with very limited availability for research.

Before it could be covered, classification as a narcotic would have to be changed, criminal penalties lifted and various formulations would have to go through the same rigorous clinical trials that the FDA requires of prescription drugs. The current lack of evidence for effectiveness is due at least in part to the absence of randomized controlled trials.

With limited research but approval by nearly half the states, “we have kind of a big, poorly controlled natural experiment,” said Brendan Saloner, an assistant professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

He called the new study “a good first step in establishing that substitution might be going on” but cautioned against using the findings to predict that medical marijuana was providing a net benefit. The Medicare prescription data by itself cannot indicate which patients were using medicinal cannabis and not using prescribed medication, Saloner said. It also does not show whether the patients were helped or harmed (or experiencing a placebo effect).

“It does, however, help us think about the intended medical consequences of medical marijuana laws,” Saloner said.

Marijuana, for example, is sometimes considered a “gateway” to harder drugs, but as a pain reliever it may also be a substitute for powerful opioids. Saloner’s own study, published two years ago in JAMA Internal Medicine, found that opioid overdose mortality rates were 25 percent lower in states with medical marijuana than in states without.


©2016 The Philadelphia Inquirer

Comments (5)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • “Let’s say a patient comes to my office saying, ‘I’m using marijuana to sleep because your drugs didn’t work for me — and by the way, I’ve flunked out of school,’ Bostwick said, “You may need to decide whether you want your degree or your drug.”

    “Let’s say”, huh? In other words, this is a hypothetical and a false dichotomy rolled into one. Has Dr. Bostwick ever had this actually happen? If so, how many times?

    Actual science works with actual data, not contrived hypotheticals. Actual science frowns on false dichotomies — “degree vs. drug”, indeed.

    The peculiar thing is that Dr. Bostwick’s real-life position is considerably more nuanced, as befits a man of science. It appears the reporter was looking for an easy, cheap, attention-grabbing throwaway quote. Alas, Bostwick was all too eager to oblige him.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up