Trump meets with Supreme Court candidate
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Judge William Pryor, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, moderates a panel discussion during the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention in Washington.
WASHINGTON >> President-elect Donald Trump has met with one of the judges on his short list for potential Supreme Court nominees, less than two weeks before he is expected to announce his choice for the nation’s highest court.
Judge William Pryor, an Alabama-based judge on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, met with Trump in New York on Saturday, said two people familiar with the meeting. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the meeting had not been publicly announced.
Trump said last week that he would select a candidate to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia within his first two weeks in office. He has promised to seek someone in the conservative’s mold and said he is working from a list of 21 people, mainly conservative state and federal judges in their 50s.
For nearly a year, the court has had only eight justices, which means they can deadlock at 4-4 deadlock on decisions.
The likely confirmation of Trump’s choice by a Republican-controlled Senate would restore a fifth vote for conservative outcomes in cases involving voting rights, the power of unions and in class-action lawsuits, lost with Scalia’s death. Trump also has said he wants an abortion opponent on the bench, although it would take a second Trump appointee to bring about dramatic change on that issue.
Other potential Trump nominees include state Supreme Court judges Allison Eid of Colorado, Joan Larsen of Michigan, David Stras of Minnesota and Don Willett of Texas, and federal appellate judges Steven Colloton, Thomas Hardiman, Raymond Kethledge and Diane Sykes.
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with top news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
Trump hinted last February that he had two favorites on the list of 21, Pryor and Sykes, although there is no indication that he’s made a final decision.
Many factors come into play in choosing a Supreme Court justice, including age and gender. Typically, presidents seek nominees who have the potential for a long tenure in the lifetime appointments, seeking nominees under 60 years old. Pryor is 54.
Trump’s victory rewarded Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s strategy of refusing all year even to consider President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to take Scalia’s seat. McConnell announced on the night that Scalia died that the vacancy should be filled not by Obama, but by the next president. The Kentucky Republican was criticized for his stance by Obama, other Democrats and many legal scholars.
Pryor also is a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, an independent agency that sets sentencing guidelines for the federal courts.
He was the Alabama’s attorney general from 1997 to 2004. His predecessor in that job, Sen. Jeff Sessions, is Trump’s pick for U.S. attorney general, and the two — both natives of the city of Mobile, are said to have a close working relationship.
In a statement in 2005 following Pryor’s nomination to the Eleventh Circuit, Sessions hailed Pryor as someone who “personally does not believe in abortion. He does not believe it is right. He believes it is wrong.”
Pryor once called the 1973 landmark abortion decision, Roe v. Wade, the “worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.”
He has also warned against the danger of “activist judges” influenced by personal beliefs. When he was appointed to the Eleventh Circuit, he said he would put his personal feelings aside and follow legal precedent.
Locally, Pryor had a reputation as a scholarly attorney general, more interested in the law than rough-and-tumble politics.
After getting a ninth justice on the court, the next big question will be whether liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, and Justice Anthony Kennedy, the pivotal vote closest to the court’s center, will retire during a Trump administration or try to stay on the bench in the hope that Trump is not re-elected in 2020. Ginsburg is 83, Kennedy is 80 and Breyer is 78.
20 responses to “Trump meets with Supreme Court candidate”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This seat 1) Should be kept open until such time as a Democratic president can select a candidate, or 2) The Democratic leadership should select a replacement, and 3) it should not be filled with a person from the South or any state that has gerrymandered districts or vote suppression laws.
LOL !!!!
LOL, indeed. For better or worse, not sure as yet, Trump will set the direction of the Supreme Court for the next 20+ years. I just hope he doesn’t screw it up.
@ Marauders_1959 & AhiPoke
This was one of the MAJOR reasons why WeTheDeplorables needed PE Trump to win.
Ohhhh Yeahhhh! Let’s get America back on track!
3 days til #MAGA
IRT Marauders_1959, the very purpose of electing Donald J. Trump as President of the United States. Judge William Pryor is an example of potential nominees on the short list. And, the next 4 to 8 years there will be two or maybe three additional openings on the Supreme Court. Yes, KeoniGohan is exactly correct.
Where do the Democrats dredge up swamp critters like Sarak?
Elections have consequences. Tighten those fairy shoes and hold on for the ride.
Are you saying another 8 years or longer till a demoRAT becomes president. Sorry but you can’t change the rule because you lost. If you can’t play well with others leave the sand box.
Oh I get it…..you changed the word Democrat to demoRAT to be funny!
You are so very, very clever! When will you turn eleven?
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa so Funny. Hey Sarak! It would be like me saying. “I vote for Klastri to be the Next Supreme Court Justice”. Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
I find it very flattering but bizarre that you think about me and write about me so often.
I never think about you. Not ever. Not even once.
@ sarak
Ikefromeli?
Looks like you have your Sherlock Holmes hat on again!
That’s why you lost the last election.
The brilliance of the founding fathers as embodied in the federal constitution means everything, doesn’t it. Hawaii’s little crazy subrogation scheme with Chinese immigrants replacing native Hawaiians as Hawaii’s original people can kiss itself goodbye in any and all of its iterations.
IRT Mythman, Yes, the State of Hawaii does not have any indigenous natives, period. We are all visitors to these special Islands, even if you and your relatives are from Tahiti or Samoa.
Kuroiwaj.
With consideration to your analogy,does it also apply to the Japanese? Even if you have relatives who are from China? Yes, there are still some indigenous natives,we are called Hawaiians ,named after these Islands……… Hawaii.
IRT MoiLee, yes. All citizens of the now State of Hawaii are visitors. As you posted, even the Japanese and relatives from China. There are no indigenous natives from Hawaii. From the beginning of the first man on the Islands of Hawaii, we are all visitors. Historically, the first natives were visitors from Polynesia.
All kidding aside . Seriously my picks includes: #1. Judge Andrew Napolitano . #2.”Green Eggs and Ham” Senator Ted Cruz would be excellent picks. Hey ! Hey, hey! What about “Judge Judy” for the number 3 spot. A woman after my Heart.A true beauty of a woman and yes,with the Brains to boot!
@ MoiLee
Add Judge Jeanine Pirro to that great list.