comscore Haley supports moving U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Haley supports moving U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    UN Ambassador-designate, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, accompanied by her husband Michael, left, prepares to testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

WASHINGTON >> South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley declared her support for moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a shift firmly endorsed by Donald Trump but one that could trigger increased violence in the Middle East.

Haley, Trump’s pick to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today that she “absolutely” backs the embassy move because that’s what Israel and congressional Republicans want. But a spokesman for Jordan’s government recently told The Associated Press that the embassy move would be a “red line” for Amman and “inflame the Islamic and Arab streets.”

Jordan serves as custodian of a major Islamic shrine in east Jerusalem and the Palestinians seek a capital there.

Congress ordered the embassy relocation more than 20 years ago, but presidents ever since, Republican and Democrat, have refused to comply. Several Republican senators have proposed legislation that would withhold 50 percent of the State Department’s 2017 budget until the embassy move from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is completed.

During a confirmation hearing that lasted nearly three-and-a-half hours, Haley took a tougher stance against Russia than Trump, who will be sworn in Friday, and agreed with a Republican senator who said Syria is committing genocide against its people.

Haley said she believes Russia committed war crimes by bombing Syrian civilians in the city of Aleppo. Rex Tillerson, Trump’s choice for secretary of state, declined to make that accusation during his confirmation hearing last week.

While Trump has said he believes Russia can be a partner, Haley said she doesn’t think Moscow can be trusted right now. She said she’s opposed to lifting existing sanctions against Russia unless it changes its behavior in Syria, Ukraine and elsewhere. Cooperation with Russia in such areas as counterterrorism, Haley said, depends on Moscow altering course.

“The problem is there are no boundaries with Russia,” said Haley, who added that the U.S. needs to let Moscow know “we are not OK” with Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its incursions into eastern Ukraine.

Haley assailed the Obama administration for failing to block a U.N. Security Council resolution that condemned Israel’s settlements in east Jerusalem and the West Bank. She pledged to reject future measures that she said unfairly targeted the Jewish state, if the Senate confirms her nomination.

Haley said she won’t go to U.N. headquarters in New York and “abstain when the U.N. seeks to create an international environment that encourages boycotts of Israel.” She told the committee the U.N. resolution was “a terrible mistake” that makes a peace agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians harder to achieve.

Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, thanked Haley in a statement issued during the hearing for her “unequivocal support and her clear statement regarding the U.N.’s discrimination against Israel.”

Haley acknowledged she is new to international diplomacy. But she said while the U.N. has had many successes, citing health and food programs that have saved millions of lives, “any honest assessment also finds an institution that is often at odds with American national interests and American taxpayers.”

The United States contributes 22 percent of the organization’s budget, and Haley questioned whether such a sizable investment is worthwhile.

“We are a generous nation,” Haley said. “But we must ask ourselves what good is being accomplished by this disproportionate contribution. Are we getting what we pay for?”

Haley said she would focus on “fixing” the U.N. and agreed that money should not continue to be funneled into programs that don’t work. But she said she’s not in favor of a “slash and burn” strategy in which American dollars are used as leverage. She said she doesn’t agree with conservative lawmakers who want to withhold any U.S. financial contributions to the U.N. until the Security Council resolution is repealed.

Last December, Israel and its supporters lashed out at Obama for his decision to abstain and allow the U.N. Security Council to approve the resolution, which called the Israeli settlements “a flagrant violation under international law.”

But Secretary of State John Kerry defended the decision in a speech last month, saying the U.S. was standing up for a two-state solution when it abstained on the resolution. He criticized Israel for settlement building and blamed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for dragging Israel away from democracy.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature
Comments (9)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • Haley’s comments that “that is what the Republicans and Israel wants” is troubling. She is Trump’s choice as the next U.S.ambassador to the UN and already there are alarms raised as to possible violence in the Mideast if Israel’s capital is moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. I once had hoped that Haley would someday be nominated for the presidency because of her Indian/Sikh background. But instead of a tolerant, unbiased person as hoped, especially as a UN ambassador, she is putting her political ambitions first.

  • the Palestinians seek a capital in east Jerusalem that’s a bunch of crap, in 2007 the Israeli prime minister offered abbas the leader of the Palestinians all of the west bank, gaza before hamas took over, and east jerusalem as there capital city, abbas took the plans to his other leaders and never gave israel an answer to that proposal, because all Israel is asking from the Palestinians is for them to renounce terrorism and recognize Israel as a right to exist in the middle east and the Palestinians won’t do that, so scr__w them they don’t deserve it. go forward with the plan to move the embassy to Jerusalem.

    • I think you are right

      The Arabs in the area have been repeatedly offered a two state solution since the 1930’s
      They have turned it down repeatedly, openly preferring the elimination of Israel

      But how do you deal with another ‘state’ in the middle of your country, one that repeatedly calls for your destruction?
      One that you could never trust?
      A solution is to neutralize it with settlements, which seems both effective and humane

      As for the “legality” – the League of Nations, when dividing up the Ottoman empire, created an all-Arab state, Jordan, east of the Jordan River
      The area to the west, which became the British Mandate, was to include a homeland for the Jewish people
      The Arabs coming out of Jordan seized what is called the West Bank when they invaded in 1948, immediately after the British left
      The Israeli’s took it back when they won the 1967 war

Scroll Up