comscore Judge says Dakota pipeline protest suit unlikely to succeed | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Judge says Dakota pipeline protest suit unlikely to succeed


    Law enforcement and protesters clash near the site of the Dakota Access pipeline in Cannon Ball, N.D.

BISMARCK, N.D. >> Dakota Access pipeline opponents involved in a violent clash with police in North Dakota in November are unlikely to succeed in a lawsuit alleging excessive force and civil rights violations, a federal judge said Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Daniel Hovland didn’t immediately rule on a motion filed Monday by law enforcement to dismiss the lawsuit, but he did deny an earlier request by pipeline opponents to bar police from using such things as chemical agents and water sprays as a means of dispersing crowds of protesters.

Hovland said protesters “are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims,” which include that police used inappropriate force, injuring more than 200 protesters, and violated their civil rights. The judge said protesters were trespassing during the confrontation and that “no reasonable juror could conclude” that officers acted unreasonably.

“The rights of free speech and assembly do not mean, and have never meant, that everyone who chooses to protest against the Dakota Access pipeline may do so at any time, any place, and under any set of conditions they choose in total disregard of the law,” Hovland said. “To allow that to occur would result in anarchy and an end to the rule of law in civilized society.”

Rachel Lederman, lead attorney for the protesters, called Hovland’s ruling “disturbing” and said she’ll appeal.

“The judge indicates that he’s formed opinions based on television and newspapers and pretty much disregards the large volume of evidence that the plaintiffs have presented,” she said.

Randall Bakke, attorney for the officers, said he was pleased with the ruling.

The Nov. 20-21 confrontation occurred at a blockaded bridge near the encampment where pipeline opponents have gathered in the hundreds and sometimes thousands since last summer, fighting a $3.8 billion project they believe could harm drinking water and Native American cultural sites. That’s disputed by Energy Transfer Partners, the Texas-based developer of the four-state pipeline to move North Dakota oil 1,200 miles through South Dakota and Iowa to Illinois.

Law enforcement acknowledges using tear gas, pepper spray, rubber bullets, bean bag rounds and water sprays against protesters they say assaulted officers with rocks, burning logs, lug nuts, padlocks and frozen water bottles. Officers say they were heavily outnumbered by protesters and were being marked by lasers and spotlights, leading to fears they were being targeted by snipers. One officer was struck in the head by a thrown object and dazed.

“In addition to being concerned about the obvious risks to the physical safety of law enforcement on the scene if overrun, there was genuine concern about the potential need to resort to deadly force for the protection of law enforcement and emergency responders,” the officers’ attorneys said in asking that the case be dismissed.

Protesters are seeking unspecified money damages. They allege a wide range of injuries, including burns, broken bones, eye injuries, hypothermia, and wounds requiring stitches and staples. Among those injured was Sophia Wilansky, a 21-year-old New York woman who was hospitalized with a serious arm injury. Protesters maintain she was injured by a grenade thrown by police, while authorities say she was hurt by a small propane tank that protesters rigged to explode.

Comments (6)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • I am following this with interest. The Standing Rock tribe has told caucasian environmentalists to leave and not to bother native Americans who know best what to do. I noted that most of the protesters were whites who had strong environmental views. Being politically correct, many were embarrassed to be found racially and culturally inept and many are leaving in tears. In Hawaii’s bizarre and very different telescope intrigue, Caucasians made up most of the protesters and many also came from the mainland looking for some action. They were not asked to leave by the 4 Hawaiians protesters because they bolstered the numbers. The media out here is easily duped. Life is complex.

    By the way, I am Mandan and our tribal council was also not invited to participate in the protests. This may change as, clearly, we also share native- American insights. The radio also said 4 Hawaiian protesters were asked to elave as they are not indigenous in anyway ay and are not really wanted. HPR reported that this morning.

    • allie> what do you do for a living? You have some good thoughts and points, but i cannot junderstand your intense haytred of TRUMP. Did he do something to hurt you in the past? I am curious about what makes you tick?????

      • I like some of what Trump is saying. If he says we need to find a way to avoid needless wars and that Russia could be an important ally, I am for that. My comments above were more about the Standing Rock controversy. I am interested in all that happens there as I grew up in North Dakota (homeless for 18 months as an infant) and am the first generation to finish high school and then college.
        I love Hawaii but also see the weaknesses and shibai here. I would like o to see more political diversity and self-reflection. As for the tiny and dwindling number of sovereignty advocates, I feel they must be honest about real history and face things for good and for bad. Most Hawaiians I know turn their back on OHA, shibai and dishonest sovereignty rhetoric. I heard much of the same growing up.

    • allie> what do you do for a living? You have some good thoughts and points, but i cannot understand your intense hatred of TRUMP. Did he do something to hurt you in the past? I am curious about what makes you tick?????

    • allie> what do you do for a living? You have some good thoughts and points, but i cannot understand your intense hatred of TRUMP. Did he do something to hurt you in the past? I am curious about what makes you tick????? I am trying to post this but it is being rejected.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up