comscore Kealoha mailbox case now in the hands of the jury | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Kealoha mailbox case now in the hands of the jury

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

    Katherine and Louis Kealoha arrive at federal court in Honolulu on Tuesday.


    Retired Honolulu police officer Gordon Shiraishi arrives at federal court in Honolulu on Tuesday.

  • CINDY ELLEN RUSSELL / March 28, 2018

    Honolulu police officer Min-Hung “Bobby” Nguyen arrives to federal court in Honolulu in March 2018.


    Honolulu police officer Derek Wayne Hahn arrives at federal court in Honolulu on Tuesday.

One of the largest public corruption trials in the state’s history was placed in the hands of the jury this afternoon after the prosecution gave final remarks to rebut defense testimony.

The 12-person jury left the courtroom about 1:40 p.m. to begin deliberations after hearing more than a day of closing arguments and 16 days of testimony from 71 witnesses, including three who took the stand for both sides.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Orabona gave a final rebuttal argument before the jury began deliberations. He went through key points made by each of the defendants’ lawyers in an attempt to undermine their arguments.

Earlier in the day, attorneys for two of the defendants, Honolulu Police Department Lt. Derek Wayne Hahn and retired Maj. Gordon Shiraishi, gave their closing arguments.

Lawyers for the other three — retired Police Chief Louis Kealoha, his wife, former Honolulu deputy prosecutor Katherine Kealoha and officer Minh-Hung “Bobby” Nguyen – gave their closing statements Tuesday.

Because the government has the burden of proof, it had the last word before the jury began deliberations.

The five defendants are accused of conspiring to frame Gerard Puana, Katherine Kealoha’s uncle, for the alleged theft of the Kealohas’ Kahala mailbox in 2013 and then lying to federal authorities about their actions.

Prosecutors say the alleged conspiracy was meant to discredit Puana because of a 2013 lawsuit that he and his mother, Florence Puana, filed against Katherine Kealoha, accusing her of stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Attorney Randall Hironaka, who represents Nguyen, went through the main evidence against his client this morning and told jurors that the government relied on key witnesses who are not credible and that the evidenced failed to prove a conspiracy.

Attorney Lars Isaacson, who represents Shiraishi, likewise called into question the strength of the government’s case, saying there was no evidence proving a conspiracy and there were legitimate, reasonable explanations to counter the prosecution’s allegations against his client.

But Orabona countered those arguments and the ones made by the other defense attorneys, asking the jury to find the defendants guilty of the charges.

Kealoha trial jury instructions by Honolulu Star-Advertiser on Scribd

Comments (39)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up