Letter: Anderson mismanaged scrutiny
In a democracy, cabinet appointees shouldn’t be, but often are, political paybacks for the financial help a successful candidate received during their campaign.
Maybe Ikaika Anderson’s failure to win confirmation was a good example of “a stitch in time saves nine” (“Ikaika Anderson withdraws DHHL nomination,” Star-Advertiser, Top News, Feb. 15).
Historically, political appointees and the choice of insiders to manage real-life challenges often results in more chaos and wasted time down the line. Anderson mismanaged the scrutiny from the onset.
Maybe the committee dodged a bullet here. It would have been far better to avoid the problem in the first place.
James T. Nakata
Kaneohe
EXPRESS YOURSELF
The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions. Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor.
>> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.
>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite 210 Honolulu, HI 96813
>> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), 529-4750 (fax), letters@staradvertiser.com, staradvertiser.com/editorial/submit-letter