Spate of random slashings across New York City sows fear
NEW YORK » Tony-award winning playwright David Henry Hwang was carrying groceries down a Brooklyn street when he felt like he got hit in the back of the head. He suddenly couldn’t walk straight.
“I kept veering into a wall, then a parked car. And that’s when I realized I was bleeding,” Hwang, the author of “M. Butterfly,” said this week.
Hwang had been slashed with a blade by someone who came out of nowhere. The wound was so deep it severed an artery leading to his brain.
He isn’t the only victim of such an unusual crime. Since December, about a dozen such random, unprovoked slashings have been reported across the city, including three this week on subway trains. All were committed by strangers, police said. They used knives, razors and, in one instance, possibly a machete.
Police say the spate of attacks is largely a coincidence. Investigators believe they were committed by different, unconnected people. But the sheer randomness of the crimes has reinforced old fears about safety in a city of strangers.
“I like to think that, as a New Yorker, I’m fairly aware — conscious of people around me,” Hwang said. “But this happened on a dark corner of my block. This was a random attack, and the number of recent random attacks surprises me. Is this a new phenomenon?”
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with top news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
The idea of a “thrill crime,” where the perpetrator seeks to feel powerful through an attack on a stranger, is not new: A good example, criminologists say, is the knockout assault that surfaces occasionally, where teenagers try to knock someone out with a single punch. The attacks seem random, but there’s often a connection, even if it’s just in motive.
“They want to create anxiety, to feel powerful, to laugh at the results,” said criminologist Jack Levin of Northeastern University, who studies the crime.
There has been an uptick in knife attacks citywide the past few months, but police statistics don’t distinguish between random and targeted attacks. And overall crime is near modern-era lows.
Commissioner William Bratton said this week that crime is inescapable.
“The reality is we still have crime in New York City. We’ll always have crime in New York City,” he said. “But the reality is also that there is less crime in this city than there has been at any time in the last 25 to 50 years.”
Chief of Detectives Robert Boyce said the spate was “a little unusual for us,” but he disregarded the idea of a copycat crime. He said officials were working quickly to arrest the perpetrators. At least three people have been arrested already.
One man was accused of slashing a 71-year-old woman on the cheek as she rode the subway to work. Another man with a history of assault arrests was charged with an unprovoked slashing attack on a man from New Jersey who was in the city to have dinner with friends. The victim in that assault needed 150 stitches to close the wound in his face.
Amanda Morris, 24, of Brooklyn, was walking to a grocery store job in Manhattan on Jan. 6 when a man who had been walking beside her suddenly reached out, slashed her face and dashed off. The attack was recorded by a security camera.
“I felt like I got punched in the face,” Morris told The New York Post. “It was like, ‘Oh, that’s weird. Why would someone punch me?’ Suddenly, blood was all over my hands, and I started crying.”
A man with a long history of arrests was later charged in the attack. He has since been accused of a similar slashing attack on a woman in the Bronx on Jan. 1 and is suspected in other assaults.
Defendants in the slashing cases could face five to 25 years in prison.
The randomness of such a crime can cause panic, but it shouldn’t, authorities say.
“At the end of the day, there are greater risks in life than this,” said Dr. Jason Hershberger, head of the psychiatry department at Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center. “This has more to do with how afraid we are of the unpredictable than a real safety problem.”
16 responses to “Spate of random slashings across New York City sows fear”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Wish I could have personal gun carry. I would help these victims.
scary area
allie is going start wearing a raincoat so that her nice clothes will not get blood on it.
Sorry, pal, there isn’t a gun made that can shoot from here to NYC. (And hit a specific target, yet!)
You’d need an ICBM. Maybe Kim Jong-Un will sell you one.
He just sold me a five gallon bucket of hot Kim Chee.
Why? Then you would have a gun covered in blood trying to aim back in distraught, putting innocent by-standers at risk. . Better to carry a first aid kit for your self.
“At the end of the day, there are greater risks in life than this,” said Dr. Jason Hershberger, head of the psychiatry department at Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center. “This has more to do with how afraid we are of the unpredictable than a real safety problem.”
Sounds like this guy needs to hae his head examined
Hard to imagine a greater risk than having a major artery in your body slashed– leaving one to bleed to death on a cold sidewalk. But what do I know?
The point he’s making is that you’re more likely to die in a car accident than be attacked by some random guy with a knife. Is this really so difficult to comprehend? Seriously? Why are the comments here always filled with people who have the intelligence of nine-year-old children?
Dude, I’m 8 years old and I am offended by your comment.
“At the end of the day, there are greater risks in life than this,” said Dr. Jason Hershberger, head of the psychiatry department at Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center. “This has more to do with how afraid we are of the unpredictable than a real safety problem.”
Sounds like this guy needs to have his head examined
“I see everything twice!”
— Yossarian
This article caters up a lot of gory details, but no useful comparative statistics by which the reader could judge the number of these recent incidents compared with the long-term average.
In one place it’s termed a “spate” (ie “sudden rush” of an increase) and then a bit farther down it’s an “uptick” (ie slight increase, like the tick of a clock’s second hand). Both of these are excellent words to use in an article.
But you can’t characterize these attacks both those ways at the same time, and absent any hard numbers all we can do is guess at the actual magnitude of the change.
We need more thorough reporting if we’re to draw any valid conclusions.
what an effed up society we live in…
Have to admit I had to “google” sow fear. I thought there was a bunch of female pigs loose–four legged that is.
Guess this means the end of staring at your smartphone while walking? Got to be paying attention to your surroundings from now on.