comscore Japan prepares for release of tritium from Fukushima plant | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Japan prepares for release of tritium from Fukushima plant

  • A worker, wearing protective suits and masks, took notes on Feb. 10 in front of storage tanks for radioactive water at the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan. (Toru Hanai/Pool Photo via AP)

TOKYO » To dump or not to dump a little-discussed substance is the question brewing in Japan as it grapples with the aftermath of the nuclear catastrophe in Fukushima five years ago. The substance is tritium.

The radioactive material is nearly impossible to remove from the huge quantities of water used to cool melted-down reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, which was wrecked by the massive tsunami in northeastern Japan in March 2011.

The water is still accumulating since 300 tons are needed every day to keep the reactors chilled. Some is leaking into the ocean.

Huge tanks lined up around the plant, at last count 1,000 of them, each hold hundreds of tons of water that have been cleansed of radioactive cesium and strontium but not of tritium.

Ridding water of tritium has been carried out in laboratories. But it’s an effort that would be extremely costly at the scale required for the Fukushima plant, which sits on the Pacific coast. Many scientists argue it isn’t worth it and say the risks of dumping the tritium-laced water into the sea are minimal.

Their calls to simply release the water into the Pacific Ocean are alarming many in Japan and elsewhere.

Rosa Yang, a nuclear expert at the Electric Power Research Institute, based in Palo Alto, California, who advises Japan on decommissioning reactors, believes the public angst is uncalled for. She says a Japanese government official should simply get up in public and drink water from one of the tanks to convince people it’s safe.

But the line between safe and unsafe radiation is murky, and children are more susceptible to radiation-linked illness. Tritium goes directly into soft tissues and organs of the human body, potentially increasing the risks of cancer and other sicknesses.

“Any exposure to tritium radiation could pose some health risk. This risk increases with prolonged exposure, and health risks include increased occurrence of cancer,” said Robert Daguillard, a spokesman for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The agency is trying to minimize the tritium from U.S. nuclear facilities that escapes into drinking water.

Right after the March 2011 disaster, many in Japan panicked, some even moving overseas although they lived hundreds of miles (kilometers) away from the Fukushima no-go zone. By now, concern has settled to the extent that some worry the lessons from the disaster are being forgotten.

Tritium may be the least of Japan’s worries. Much hazardous work remains to keep the plant stabilized, and new technology is needed for decommissioning the plant’s reactors and containing massive radioactive contamination.

The ranks of Japan’s anti-nuclear activists have been growing since the March 2011 accident, and many oppose releasing water with tritium into the sea. They argue that even if tritium’s radiation is weaker than strontium or cesium, it should be removed, and that good methods should be devised to do that.

Japan’s fisheries organization has repeatedly expressed concerns over the issue. News of a release of the water could devastate local fisheries just as communities in northeastern Japan struggle to recover from the 2011 disasters.

An isotope of hydrogen, or radioactive hydrogen, tritium exists in water form, and so like water can evaporate, although it is not known how much tritium escaped into the atmosphere from Fukushima as gas from explosions.

The amount of tritium in the contaminated water stored at Fukushima Dai-ichi is estimated at 3.4 peta becquerels, or 34 with a mind-boggling 14 zeros after it.

But theoretically collected in one place, it would amount to just 57 milliliters, or about the amount of liquid in a couple of espresso cups — a minuscule quantity in the overall masses of water.

To illustrate that point, Shunichi Tanaka, chairman of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, showed reporters a small bottle half-filled with blue water that was the equivalent of 57 milliliters.

Public distrust is running so high after the Fukushima accident that Tokyo Electric Power Co., or TEPCO, the utility that operates the Fukushima plant and oversees its decommissioning, has mostly kept quiet about the tritium, pending a political decision on releasing the water.

Privately, they say it will have to be released, but they can’t say that outright.

What will be released from Fukushima will be well below the global standard allowed for tritium in the water, say Tanaka and others favoring its release, which is likely to come gradually later this year, not all at once.

Proponents of releasing the tritium water argue that tritium already is in the natural environment, coming from the sun and from water containing tritium that is routinely released at nuclear plants around the world.

“Tritium is so weak in its radioactivity it won’t penetrate plastic wrapping,” said Tanaka.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature
Comments (12)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • Fishery a major source of food could be contaminated for ages/forever. Why tempt Mother Nature with unknown science? There are only risks, outweigh zero benefits, only for ground space needed for storage of nuclear contaminant in Japan. Penalty for building nuclear generating plants close to areas susceptible to tsunamis caused by earthquake prone Japanese sea coast.

    • Japan, where Kerry just paid respect to the horrors of nuclear technology, needs to follow in the footsteps of Germany, where ALL nuclear energy is being decommissioned. There is ZERO reason to continue, when many alternatives, like wind, solar, geothermal and ocean are viable. I could see if nuclear was the only option, but it is no longer necessary. Japan has leaders, both governmental, and industrial, that need to retire, or pass on. That is the only way they will move beyond the 20th century they still live in.

      I really don’t want to see glow in the dark opihi and ogo. In my grocer. Or the shoreline.

  • Expense should not even be mentioned.
    If it is possible it should be done.
    Reactor associated organizations created this problem now they are obligated to fix it.
    If it bankrupts them while doing so is irrelevant. Start with Reactor operators and if they run out of noney shut them down sell assets and use all assets for clean up. If that is not enough go after companies that built, designed and engineered plant banks who financed construction and then the Japanese gov. for licenseing the plan.
    Think of the Moral Hazard if these arganizations are allowed to walk away from their responsibilities. Just as we are told that individuals must take responsibility for their actions so it must be for the companies otherwise we are just rewarding bad behavior.

  • ..”Japanese government official should simply get up in public and drink water from one of the tanks to convince people it’s safe”.. “Rosa” should go first.., followed by TEPCO AND HITACHI’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS… To Date: “JAPAN” has killed multiple species of sea-life in the PACIFIC OCEAN..; AND, IT’S BECOMING WORSE EACH DAY… (OH.., should I mention the deformed CHILDREN of “FUKUSHIMA”?)
    Just a small sampling of HEADLINES and readings FROM JAPAN (currently):

    Fukushima Resident’s Feet Turn Black, Coughing Blood, Boils

    Fukushima Ice Wall Freezing ‘Going Well – TEPCO

    Braving Danger And Radiation For $100 A Day

    Your Radiation This Week – No 51

    Fukushima Rad Plume To West Coast – Many Will Die

    Japan Nuclear Plants Vulnerable To Terrorists

    ‘Unprecedented Death’ All Along The US West Coast

    Massive Cover-up Of Fukushima Children Deaths

    Wild Radioactive Fukushima Boars Ravage Countryside

    • “Wild Radioactive Fukushima Boars Ravage Countryside” Perhaps, as a Mililani Psychologist, you might want to consult a psychiatrist about your disturbing thoughts.

  • If my math is correct, that amount of radioactivity corresponds to a bit less than 100,000 Curies (since a Curie = 3.4 x 10 to the 10th power Becquerels and the article says 3.7 x 10 to the 15th power). That in turn corresponds to 100 Kg, or roughly 450 pounds, of radium. That’s a pretty substantial amount of radioactivity to pack into 57 milliliters of liquid tritium. Makes me think somebody’s math is wrong — if it’s mine, please correct me.

    • The half life of tritium is about 12.3 years. Within about a generation, most of it should be helium. It would be a problem for people in immediate contact but I’m guessing, if it were significantly diluted, it would not pose a significant environmental threat. I would be interested in the opinion of environmental scientists on this forum.

  • Tritium is interesting and useful stuff.

    It is used in a 3% liquid in airplane glow-in-the-dark/smoke exit signs. The signs “glow” only for three years, maximum, and are replaced.

    In gas form, variable percentages, it is used to “enhance” the yield of nuclear bombs. The famous “dial a nuke”. Variable yields depending on the amount of tritium used. Clever collateral damage “control”.

Scroll Up