comscore As homeowners prosper, renters reel | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Business

As homeowners prosper, renters reel

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Christi Fabie works at her dining table at the rental home she shares with her husband, Joe Fabie, in Charleston, S.C. The Fabies had rented in nearby Mount Pleasant, but rising rent on their one-bedroom apartment made it impossible to save for a starter home of their own.

MOUNT PLEASANT, S.C. >> It’s a troublesome story playing out across America in the 10 years since the housing bubble peaked and then burst in a ruinous crash: As real estate has climbed back, homeowners are thriving while renters are struggling.

For many longtime owners, times are good. They’re enjoying the benefits of growing equity and reduced mortgage payments from ultralow rates.

But for America’s growing class of renters, surging costs, stagnant pay and rising home values have made it next to impossible to save enough to buy.

The possible consequences are bleak for a nation already grappling with economic inequality: Whatever wealth most Americans possess mainly comes from home equity, meaning that the increase in renters gives fewer people that same level of financial security.

Nearly two-thirds of adults still own homes. And some who rent do so by choice. Yet ownership has become a more distant dream for the many Americans, as rental prices and demand have surged in areas that offer the best job prospects as well as those that have been battered by foreclosures.

“It doesn’t paint a pretty picture,” said Svenja Gudell, chief economist at Zillow, the online real estate database company. “You’re really blocking out a group of buyers from owning a home. They’re truly living paycheck to paycheck, and that does not put them into a good position to buy.”

Joe Fabie and his wife face just such a bind.

They moved to Mount Pleasant, just over the bridge from historic Charleston, after law school in Pittsburgh. The suburb’s pastel-hued harbor vistas, tin-roofed houses and Spanish moss-adorned live oaks were enchanting.

But the rising rent on their one-bedroom apartment made it impossible to save enough to buy a home. So the couple moved to a cheaper suburb in hopes of saving for a starter home.

“The best school district is Mount Pleasant, and we would like to be there,” said Fabie, 27. “But if you’re lucky you can get some beat-up homes for around $300,000.”

An exclusive analysis by the Associated Press of census data covering over 300 communities found that two major forces are driving a wedge between the fortunes of renters and homeowners:

>> Historically low mortgage rates have enabled homeowners to refinance and shrink their monthly payments, thereby reducing a major household cost. The median annual mortgage expense for a U.S. homeowner has dropped by $1,492 since 2006.

>> A combination of foreclosures and new college graduates crowding into the strongest job markets has raised demand for rentals. Renters accounted for all the 8 million-plus net households the United States added in the past decade. Home ownership has dipped to 63.5 percent, near a 48-year low.

That demand has driven up rents, which, in turn, have prevented or delayed people from buying first homes. Outside of a pocket of relative stability seen in parts of the Midwest such as Minneapolis and St. Louis, the momentum has moved away from ownership.

The residue of the housing bubble remains achingly visible in Las Vegas. Thousands of houses are stuck in the foreclosure pipeline, controlled by banks, and could flood the market should prices recover enough. Nearly half of Las Vegas now rents, compared with less than 40 percent a decade ago.

Consider the shift toward renting in the Piedmont Park neighborhood of Apopka, a former agricultural hub outside Orlando, Fla., now crowded with housing developments.

Where 1 in 10 homes once were rentals, now more than a third are. Many are owned by Wall Street investment firms that bought them out of foreclosure at deep discounts.

Erika Pringley, a 42-year-old police dispatcher, rents with her husband a three-bedroom ranch house. Through a string of subsidiaries, the house is owned by Blackstone, the world’s largest real estate private equity group.

At the price paid by investors, the equivalent of the monthly mortgage would be under $500.

Pringley’s rent: $1,310 a month.

Pringley, who works for the Florida Highway Patrol, hopes to buy a home — if she can emerge from debt.

“At my age, I want to own something that’s my own, have something that’s my own,” she said.

Higher rents are closing the path of accruing wealth through ownership. On average, homeowners have a net housing wealth of $150,506, according to figures soon to be released by the Urban Institute’s Housing Finance Center.

Elsewhere, rising prosperity is the reason why renters are stuck.

Just as the economy tanked nearly a decade ago, millennials began flooding the best job markets after college and graduate school where rents are disproportionately higher.

Over the past decade, the number of under-35 college graduates in Washington rocketed up more than 50 percent to nearly 100,000. Bistros, boutiques and posh apartments opened along the once-downtrodden 14th Street corridor.

All this has created a paradox in Washington: Incomes are rising — normally fuel for home buying — even as homeownership is declining.

Mortgage rates below 4 percent have enabled Jim Phillips, 51, to capitalize on the influx, buying condos and renting them at a profit.

“With more and more younger people moving into the city, it’s creating an opportunity for me,” Phillips said. “So far, I have two condos. My goal is to buy, basically, one a year.”

The opportunities are there for people who have money — or those who are already homeowners.

Alpana Patel and her husband landed a house in San Marcos, Calif., about 35 miles from San Diego, in 2007. To buy their $845,000 home, they took out an interest-only mortgage with an adjustable rate starting at 6.7 percent. Including property taxes and insurance, their monthly costs totaled about $6,000.

The couple refinanced in 2013 at a rate of just 3.75 percent, which shrank their monthly payment by $2,000.

The couple eventually decided to rent out that house at a price that covers nearly all their mortgage costs and to buy a second, larger home where they could live.

“Now we’re able to own two homes because we hung in there,” Patel said.

Comments (10)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • Government is the biggest contributor to this problem by leaving interest rates low. They are creating home price inflation. The longer they keep rates this low, the more damage they do to the economy.

    • No it’s not. So what happens when you need the money locked up in your house? The best investment is to have a diverse investment portfolio.

  • We rented our first home way below what the average renters were paying. Throughout the years when others were increasing the rates of their rental properties, we kept ours at the same initial rate. The family was our first and last tenants. Nearly a decade or two later and no change in the rental fee , they bought a brand new home and our rented home was purchased by a member of our family, at no additional cost but its value. The home is now worth close to a million dollars. We have no regrets of it having rented out way below the average rental rates during that period. Nor having it sold without a profit! The knowledge we were instrumental for both the renters and the family member owning their own homes, are our contributions toward peace and good will on earth! Pollyanna-ish? So be it! All we know it’s a great feeling having done what we did.

  • “To buy their $845,000 home, they took out an interest-only mortgage …”

    Very very bad decision. Very few manage to flip in a timely manor while still making any reasonable profit, the rest get slaughtered in the next recession/bubble pop and then these interest only homes get auctioned off at the courthouse steps for pennies on the dollar.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up