comscore Russia sees Trump as conduit for eased sanctions | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Russia sees Trump as conduit for eased sanctions


    Russia’s government staunchly denies reports that it tampered in the U.S. election or supported either candidate, but once the results were in, members of President Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party didn’t hold back.

WASHINGTON >> Russia’s government denies that it tampered in the U.S. election or even took sides. But now that the results are in, members of President Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party aren’t holding back.

“It turns out that United Russia won the elections in America,” Viktor Nazarov, the governor of Omsk, Russia, declared in a radio interview.

Long before Donald Trump was on the radar of American voters, Russia had deep interests in the outcome of elections around the world. But 2016 presented a unique window.

Motivated by years of crippling economic sanctions and decades of post-Soviet setbacks, the Russians were keener than ever to pounce; the race for the White House, plagued by party infighting and scandal, was easy bait.

For Putin, sanctions relief is a gateway to the ultimate goal of establishing Russia as the political and economic equivalent of the United States. Trump, who has extolled Putin’s leadership and called for a tempered approach to U.S.-Russia relations, may be a conduit to achieving that.

“It’s much more about institutions, not about personalities,” said Robert Amsterdam, an international attorney who has a number of high-profile Russian clients. Putin “was seriously impacted by the sanctions because it targeted his closest friends and now they think Trump is going to change that.”

U.S. intelligence agencies said in October they are confident that the Russian government hacked the e-mails of U.S. citizens and institutions, including political organizations, and handed them over to and WikiLeaks for distribution. Hacked Democratic National Committee emails in July, indicating that DNC leaders were favoring Hillary Clinton over Sen. Bernie Sanders in the primaries, prompted the resignation of chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

“Weaponizing information is really about who gets to write the truth, who gets to write the narrative and who benefits from that narrative — and that is incredibly powerful,” said Laura Galante, director of intelligence analysis at cybersecurity firm FireEye, Inc.

Russia has sought to put itself on an equal footing with the U.S. since the collapse of the Soviet Union, extending its territory where it can, countering U.S. military action and positioning itself as a rival to the world’s biggest economy.

But its ambitions suffered a setback in 2014 when the Obama administration authorized sanctions against sectors of the Russian economy, including financial services, energy, mining and defense. The administration also sanctioned people in Putin’s inner circle accused of undermining peace in Ukraine. Add to that falling oil prices and a weak ruble, and Russia’s economy was shackled.

The impact has been extensive. Russia’s sovereign wealth fund had $87 billion in assets in December 2013, according to the Russian Finance Ministry. As of June 1, it was down to $38 billion, following sell-offs by the Russian government to make up for budget deficits. U.S. trade with Russia tumbled to $23 billion in 2015, from about $34 billion the previous year.

Sanctions that impede Russia’s ability to acquire equipment for Arctic offshore drilling are of particular concern because they hold the key to Russia’s rapid expansion in that sector.

“Lifting restrictions on exports of technology, software, things that really help their energy industry extract oil and gas” would be the top priority, said Boris Zilberman, a Russia expert at the Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

“Production is dwindling over time, so they’re going into new, offshore, deep-water drilling in the Arctic and so on, and to do that, they really need Western technology,” he said.

Sanctions relief is important to Russia’s broader objective of superpower status, shown by its bullish Syria policy. Syria’s Russian-backed military made major gains in rebel-held eastern Aleppo in recent days and rebel resistance appeared to be crumbling. While Moscow and Washington are continuously at odds over Syria, the Obama administration has not imposed any Syria-related sanctions.

Trump’s promise of closer cooperation with Russia has created worries that the U.S. will have diminished leverage. He said during the campaign that under his leadership the U.S. might not come to the defense of some NATO members if Russia were to attack them, indicating he would make that decision based on whether those Baltic republics “have fulfilled their obligations to us.”

But Trump’s positions are hard to assess because he’s often stepped away from his more controversial proposals. Trump’s choice as defense secretary, retired Gen. James Mattis, has called Russia’s aggression in Ukraine a problem “much more severe, more serious” than Washington and the European Union are treating it.

Putin and Trump spoke soon after his victory and a statement from Trump’s transition team said the president-elect told Putin he looked forward to “a strong and enduring relationship.” Observers caution that Putin’s interests are self-motivated and Russia’s incentive to interfere in U.S. politics won’t go away with Trump’s victory.

“It’s not that Putin is against the Democratic Party,” Zilberman said. “He’s more against the United States and (for) whatever may push Russian interests.”

He added: “There’s nothing saying that next time they won’t hack Republicans and expose Trump administration emails if it benefits them.”

Comments (14)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • In the presidential debate when Romney announced that Russia was our biggest foreign concern, Obama, said–Mitch, the Cold War is over they are not a problem. I like the idea that a new Administration can look at many things, including our foreign policy with new eyes and ideas. The world looks at America for innovation and guidance–Make us a Great Leader again and not bow to other leaders!

    • Agree. New and fresh eyes and approaches provide an opportunity. Our world and nation are not going in a positive direction; an understatement. The interesting thing is that Trump may be the type of person to ‘deal’ with the aggressive leaders of the world such as Putin, Xi Jinping, Duterte who seemed to not respect Obama. It’s just a bit scary but so far Trump is doing fine. The media continues to enjoy ripping everything about him so nothing new there.

  • Here’s Trump’s chance to show how tough he is or if he is going to be just a paper tiger bowing down to his pal Putin who he owes a lot of favors to.

    • I am not sure the being tough is the right thing here.

      The sanctions were imposed when Russia took back the Crimea.
      The Crimea has historically been part of Russia for a long time.
      It was part of the Ukraine when it did not matter, when the Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, which was dominated by Russia.
      If there were a vote today, all the evidence indicates the majority of the people in the Crimea would choose to be in Russia.

      Russia has a major part of its fleet in the Crimea.
      The Ukraine has been flirting with NATO membership for some time.
      This raised the prospect of the Russian Navy port in the Black Sea, sometimes referred to as its unsinkable aircraft carrier, falling under the control of the West,

      The sanctions seemed to me to have been heavy handed and naive, and the sort of thing that leads to unnecessary war.

  • “Weaponizing information is really about who gets to write the truth, who gets to write the narrative and who benefits from that narrative — and that is incredibly powerful,” said Laura Galante, director of intelligence analysis at cybersecurity firm FireEye, Inc.

    That is why Trump won this election. The mainstream media lost it’s ability to dictate what “truth” was, and failed push Clinton through. All this fuss about “fake” news is just a distraction the real threat has always been established news sources pushing their own agenda instead of reporting the news.

    • I agree with you about but find it isn’t exclusive to mainstream media and Clinton. I see your comment also applying to what is happened with alt-media and Trump. The problem now is who do you trust if the mainstream has been proven to bend the truth for benefit and the alt-media is bending the truth for benefit then where do we go.

  • The US has the opportunity now to really reset relations with Russia. I hope Trump takes full advantage of it.
    Islamic terrorists and their supporters (Saudi’s) should be worried, very worried. If America, Europe and Russia stand together, they don’t stand a chance.

  • Michael Morrell, former acting director of the CIA:

    “In Putin’s mind, I have no doubt that Putin thinks that [Trump is] an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation, although Putin would never say that, From Mr. Trump’s perspective, he simply heard Putin compliment him. He then responded by complimenting him. He never thought that he might be being played. He played this perfectly, right. He saw that Donald Trump wanted to be complimented. He complimented him. That led Donald Trump to then compliment Vladimir Putin and to defend Vladimir Putin’s actions in a number of places around the world. And Donald Trump didn’t even understand that Putin was playing him.”

  • With Trump leading the White House chapter of the Putin fan club (charter members include Trump advisors and paid Putin apologists like General Flynn, Paul Manafort, and Carter Page), I think Putin should be very happy. Russia seizing Ukraine? No problem. Russia supporting Assad in Syria? No problem. Putin objects to NATO? No problem, Trump offers to dismantle NATO. Given the strong possibility that Putin-controlled Russian banks are keeping the Trump businesses afloat after American banks blacklisted him, Trump’s biggest conflict of interest may be the Russian connection. Trump could prove that he owes nothing to Putin and his cronies by releasing his tax returns, but that will never happen. We can only hope that some patriot will leak them to the press.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up