Musk demands bigger stake in Tesla as price for AI work
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, stunned investors by demanding that the company’s board give him shares worth more than $80 billion if it wants him to continue developing products based on artificial intelligence.
In the latest demonstration of his disregard for conventional ways of communicating with investors, Musk said late Monday on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter that he owns, that he needed to own 25% of Tesla to avoid takeovers and have enough control of the company as it develops robots and other AI technology.
If his demands are not met, Musk said, he would pursue unspecified ventures outside of Tesla. In addition to electric cars, Tesla has been developing a humanoid robot called Optimus and uses AI to develop self-driving technology, a cornerstone of the company’s strategy. Those businesses belong to Tesla, and Musk could not simply walk away with them.
The company’s stock market valuation of almost $700 billion — more than twice as much as Toyota Motor, the world’s largest automaker by annual car sales — is predicated in part on investors’ belief that the company will lead the rest of the industry in developing cars that can drive from place to place without human intervention. Investors are also betting that advanced automation will allow Tesla to manufacture cars much more efficiently and profitably than rivals.
Musk owns 13% of Tesla after selling a substantial portion of his stake to finance his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. The social media site has struggled under his leadership and has plunged in value. An additional 12% of Tesla would be worth $83 billion at the current share price, effectively recouping Musk’s investment in Twitter — which he has said he regrets — and then some.
“I am uncomfortable growing Tesla to be a leader in AI & robotics without having ~25% voting control,” Musk wrote on X. “Enough to be influential, but not so much that I can’t be overturned.”
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with top news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
He went on: “Unless that is the case, I would prefer to build products outside of Tesla.” But he also said the board would take no action until a Delaware judge rules in a lawsuit brought by a Tesla shareholder challenging an earlier compensation plan that was instrumental in making Musk the richest person in the world.
Musk testified in the Delaware case in late 2022. Gregory Varallo, who represents shareholders in the lawsuit, said he did not know when there would be a ruling. No documents have been filed in the case since July.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
The demand by Musk underlined the extent to which Tesla, which sold 1.8 million vehicles last year, is subject to his impulses.
“You’re never really sure what you’re going to read from Elon Musk when you get back to the office after a three-day weekend,” said Ben Rose, president of Battle Road Research, which advises institutional investors. Rose called Musk’s demand “curious and ill-timed,” considering that Tesla faces increasing competition and difficult economic conditions.
Tesla’s success under Musk forced traditional carmakers to begin offering electric vehicles, which are essential in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. But Musk’s behavior and statements have weighed on the share price and gotten him into trouble with regulators.
Tesla shares fell when Musk sold some of his stake to buy Twitter. The shares also suffered after Musk said in 2018 that he had the money to take Tesla private and delist it from the stock exchange. Musk was unable to execute the plan. The going-private statement led to a lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which Tesla settled for $40 million while agreeing that lawyers would screen what Musk says on Twitter. It was not clear whether Musk’s statement on X late Monday had been approved by lawyers.
It would be difficult for Tesla’s board, which has been criticized for not doing enough to control Musk, to grant his wish immediately or unconditionally. The company would have to issue new shares, Rose said. That would dilute the value of existing shares without raising additional capital for Tesla and might spawn shareholder lawsuits.
But Rose added that the board could assign Musk stock options that he would receive only if he achieves certain milestones over five years or more. That would be similar to a compensation package Musk received in 2018 that depended on Tesla reaching stock market valuations seen at the time as unrealistically ambitious. Musk became the world’s richest man by defying expectations and hitting the targets.
The company’s stock has fallen about 11% this year but is up about 70% over the last 12 months.
Musk did not specify which products he might develop outside the company. He has already started a separate AI business called X.AI, which last year released the Grok chatbot to selected users even though he has also highlighted the hazards of the technology in public comments.
Tesla’s main use of AI has come in its Autopilot and Full Self Driving systems, which assist drivers by taking over certain tasks in certain driving situations. Musk has said several times over the years that the company was close to perfecting the technology that would allow a car to drive itself completely. But self-driving technology has taken longer to perfect than Musk’s predictions, and many experts believe it is still years away.
The carmaker has also been working on a robot it calls Optimus. The device can fold a shirt, according to a video posted on X by Tesla on Monday, but has not become a significant source of revenue.
On X, some of Musk’s fans applauded his demand for a 25% stake, saying he earned the money. But others said it was his own fault his stake in the company has fallen. “They didn’t make you sell your shares,” one user wrote, adding, “why should the board do anything to rectify this for you?”
A stake of less than 15% of the company, Musk said, “makes a takeover by dubious interests too easy.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2024 The New York Times Company